JPEG 2000 Reliable Video Quality from Production to Archiving Jean-Baptiste Lorent and Jerome Meessen, intoPIX
Today, the broadcast industry is increasingly turning its attention towards JPEG 2000. In recognition, the JPEG committee is currently finalizing the standardization of a new profile specifically dedicated to broadcast applications. This should be of no surprise as already the JPEG 2000 compression format guarantees the highest image and video quality while also offering many other properties that are particularly useful to the industry.
JPEG 2000 momentum in broadcast: why now?
Just a few years after its formal adoption by the digital cinema industry, JPEG 2000 is now being recommended in broadcast through various industry initiatives and standards. And: The JPEG committee is close to announcing the publication of its dedicated broadcast profile. Under the impulse of the Video Service Forum, JPEG 2000 transport over MPEG-2-TS is under standardization. Recently, several product manufacturers together formed the JPEG 2000 Alliance promoting the benefits of this format. Lastly, a wave of archiving initiatives are today favouring JPEG 2000 over other formats – including uncompressed TIFF – for saving their audio-visual heritage for future generations.
There is a good reason behind this momentum; the role of video compression formats has fundamentally changed over recent years. With ever growing transmission and storage capacity, coupled with increasing content quality and quantity, the problem is not the ability to robustly compress the content anymore. Today, the challenge is to manage the quality of the content and the access to it over entire workflows.
Formats offering compression ratios superior to JPEG 2000, such as MPEG-4 AVC/ H.264, still have to cope with the challenging consumer context where mobility, shared networks and wireless will remain key aspects. Today’s professional broadcasters prefer to avoid intrinsic image degradation in order to ensure and maintain a reliable image/ video quality from acquisition and production through to distribution and preservation: just what JPEG 2000 offers.
How does JPEG 2000 work?
Firstly, JPEG 2000 is an intra-frame compression format, i.e. each video frame is compressed independently as a still picture. This provides a quality guarantee, but does create a barrier to strong compression factors. Again, it all depends on the expectation of the format. For example, if the purpose of compression is the distribution of essence and no further editing is expected, long-GOP MPEG should typically be preferred. However, if the purpose is production, I-only compression formats are ideal.
After a pre-processing phase, mainly dealing with colour de-correlation, the video frames are passed through recursive low (L) and high (H) pass wavelet filters (see Figure 1). This process is known as the Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT). It corresponds to an intra-component de-correlation that restructures the image by concentrating the image information in a small and very localized area. The recursive DWT also leads to a multi-resolution image representation. Next, the data is quantized and encoded in the Entropy Coding Unit. The quantization and the coding together achieve the compression before organizing the code stream according to a rate- distortion optimization.
Figure 1. The wavelet transform: the key step of the JPEG 2000 compression. 18
EMERGING STANDARDS
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99