This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
26


MOVING TOWARDS A CLIMATE NEUTRAL UN


tricity use for computers and servers (operation and cooling), and due to scope for reducing travel through increased use of e-communication tools.


Regarding the direct climate footprint of computers and servers, most UN organizations are upgrading computers, in so far as new hardware includes energy- saving features as a standard, and where desktops are often replaced with considerably more energy efficient laptops. Server rooms, which are on average respon- sible for about 10 per cent of the total energy con- sumption in offices, are in some cases, such as the UN Secretariat in New York, downsized so that more virtual servers run on fewer physical machines, which has a proportional impact on the energy consumption and costs for both energy and hardware.


While use of e-mail, phone- and video-conferencing has been commonplace throughout UN for many years, 29 UN organizations are now developing access to more modern e-communication tools such as on-line con- ferencing, personalized PC-based video links, internet phone conferencing and on-line class rooms. Several or- ganizations require staff to consider conducting meetings and missions through e-communication, before travel is approved. In many organizations all new computers are supplied with headsets and webcams to enable voice- over-IP and personal video conferencing applications.


There is a clear trend for UN organizations to take ad- vantage of the many opportunities for more efficient ICT support, both to reduce the direct climate footprint of ICT equipment and support reduced emissions from other activities, in particular meetings, travel and com- munication.


UNECE has also implemented a pilot project, entitled ‘Facilitating Electronic Public Participation and Mitigat- ing Climate Change: Proposed Feasibility Study of Tele- conferencing and Webcasting in Selected Aarhus Con- vention Meetings’. This will reduce travel to meetings, thereby contributing to a reduction of carbon emis- sions caused by UNECE activities. At the same time, an increase in web-based meeting techniques also offers greater potential for public participation in such meet- ings, if appropriate.


The UN ICT Network has established a working group to review the potential for improving access by all UN staff to high quality e-communication tools.


Flexible/remote working arrangements 2003 saw the launch of the UN Flex policy, enabling or- ganizations to arrange work schedules for staff in a way that allows work to be done more flexibly in terms of


both time and place. Sixteen UN organizations now use this policy. Although it is primarily a means of enhanc- ing the work-life balance of staff, the UN Flex Policy also has positive effects on GHG emissions. It reduces com- muting and the need for travel, allows bundling of mis- sions and reduces the need for office space. A method- ology for assessing the potential for applying UN Flex to reduce GHG emissions in individual UN offices is due for release in early 2010.


Green meetings One of the UN’s main activities is to bring together stake- holders in meetings for negotiations, training, planning and assessments. The direct and indirect climate foot- print of meetings can be large, depending on the loca- tion of the meeting, time of year, number of participants, accommodation, catering and preparation of meeting materials. Typically, the largest source of GHG emissions from meetings is travel by participants. Other sources in- clude use of heating, cooling and electricity at the meet- ing venue and hotels, and (indirectly) printing of meet- ing documents, catering, and local transport.


The UN Green Meetings Guide was released in early 2009, providing advice and checklists on how to mini- mize the environmental impact of meetings. Twelve UN organizations have already started to organize at least some of their meetings as green meetings. Prominent examples include the World Food Summit organized in Rome by FAO in 2008, UNFCCC’s COP 14 in Poznan and UNEP’s Global Environment Forum in Monaco the same year, and the Governing Council in Nairobi in 2009. In these meetings measures were implemented such as on- demand printing, pooling of transport for meeting del- egates, avoidance of excessive cooling of meeting rooms, web-casting of sessions, video presentation by some del- egates from their home countries, provision of organic food and use of recyclable cups. The travel-related cli- mate footprint of participants paid for by the organiza- tion was compensated for through purchase of offsets.


For UNFCCC COP15 in Copenhagen virtual presence teleconferencing rooms connected to similar rooms around the world have been set-up, to allow delega- tions and other participants to organize virtual face- to-face meetings with colleagues and experts abroad without requiring them to come to Copenhagen.


Simply because of the very large number of meetings organized by the UN every year, paying more attention to minimizing the climate footprint and other nega- tive environmental impact from meetings would have a large cumulative impact. This is expected to remain one of the focus areas for emissions-reductions at the UN in the coming years.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140