GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY FOR 2008 Experience and results
Data results and statistics The climate neutral focal points received the standard- ized methodology, tools and templates in April 2009, together with training sessions on their use. Over the following four months, the forty-nine UN system re- porting entities collected data and submitted GHG inventories to the EMG secretariat using the standard- ized reporting formats. The result is a comprehensive overview of source categories and emissions.
The proposed methodology and tools were used by all participating organizations except four organizations, which already had a GHG data collection system in place. Those submitted their results in the alternative format. Since the methodologies used by those organi- zations were based on the GHG Protocol, like the other UN GHG Calculator, their approaches are similar and therefore compatible.
The aggregated GHG emissions of the UN system or- ganizations for their facility operations and travel in 2008 are estimated at approximately 770 000 tonnes of CO2
lion tonnes of CO2
equivalent. An estimated additional one mil- equivalent are emitted from opera-
tions related to peacekeeping missions, including uni- formed personnel. The average annual greenhouse emissions across the UN system are approximately 8.3 tonnes of CO2
equivalent per staff member3 .
Total GHG emissions vary across organizations due to their different sizes and types of operations. The largest source of GHG emissions for the UN system organiza- tions is air travel, accounting on average for almost 50 per cent of total emissions, one third are from electric- ity and heating of facilities, twelve per cent are from of- ficial vehicles and five per cent from refrigeration and air conditioning. There is significant variation between organizations, with air travel resulting in over 90 per cent in some cases down to a few per cent in others.
The use of official vehicles is more common in country offices. There is also variation in GHG emissions from facilities, with average emission factors from electricity production ranging, for example from 0.0013 kg CO2 kWh in Mozambique to 0.9434 kg CO2
/ / kWh in India.
3. The term “staff member” is used in this inventory process to include all personnel contributing to an organization’s footprint and therefore also includes short-term staff, consultants and in- terns. Numbers may therefore differ from those provided in other official documents, depending on whether these refer to posts established in budgets or other definitions.
Furthermore, the local climatic conditions, the extent of heating and air-conditioning, and the energy effi- ciency of the buildings play an important role. These factors increase the share of total emissions from facili- ties and vehicles.
Carbon dioxide is the most significant GHG, account- ing for more than 90 per cent of total GHG emissions. This result reflects the fact that fossil fuel combustion is the principal source of GHG emissions. Another reason is that other GHGs, such as HFCs and PFCs have prob- ably been undervalued, because of limited data avail- ability. Furthermore, some energy providers have pro- vided data to organizations only in aggregated CO2
eq
format. In the latter cases, these emissions have been counted as CO2
emissions in the inventory.
Completeness and quality Organizations generally succeeded in reporting their GHG emissions required under the minimum agreed boundary. However, there are variations in quality and completeness.
The highest quality data were those which were system- atically collected and recorded, such as air travel and elec- tricity consumption. There were often difficulties obtain- ing data for fugitive emissions from air-conditioning and refrigeration, because maintenance of air-conditioning equipment is often outsourced and various types of equipment and refrigerants are used in one facility.
Air travel data Although air travel data were most of the time read- ily available through the ERP system or servicing travel agent, difficulties were experienced by some organi- zations in obtaining the data in the required data for- mat. The ICAO Carbon Emissions Calculator takes into account the actual routing of a flight rather than just the distance between origin and destination in order to better estimate emissions resulting from the trip. Furthermore, data need to be expressed in three-letter IATA airport codes. It also differentiates emissions cre- ated by a business-class flight and one in economy. However, this requires data on the exact routing and travel class which was difficult for some organizations to obtain retroactively.
For certain categories of official travel – such as entitle- ment travel (home leave), self-ticketed travel or charter flights – information on the routing and class of trav- el was not readily available. In these cases, estimates were made either by estimating the routing by select-
17
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140