This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Feature 3 | PROPELLERS AND THRUSTERS Driving out of recession


A desire to optimise propulsion efficiency is indicative in new propulsion systems unveiled during Nor-Shipping, writes Patrik Wheater


T


here is nothing quite like a recession to spur creative thinking and technological advancement in the


marine industry, especially when the focus is placed firmly on delivering energy-efficient systems capable of reducing a shipowner’s bottom line for little or no extra outlay. Indeed the drive to optimise propulsion


efficiency was indicative in the number of new – and not so new – propulsion systems being unveiled during the recent Nor-Shipping exhibition. Voith Turbo the German manufacturer


famous for the ‘Viennese whirl’, aka the Voith Schneider Propeller, is about to relaunch a product it ceased to produce more than 30 years ago. Te Voith Radial Propeller (VRP) was a


360deg azimuthing thruster introduced in the 1970s, but, despite its potential success – there are several still in operation – unit production was stopped by the end of that decade. However, following the outcome of an extensive research project in to the hydrodynamics of steerable thrusters, Voith Turbo has been able to redesign an underwater mountable VRP for optimal dynamic positioning and hull-thruster interaction. The system is being marketed towards the offshore segment. According to Voith Turbo, optimum


thruster-hull interaction is of the utmost importance to the efficiency of propellers in offshore vessel application, specifically mobile drilling units and semi-submersible rigs. Indeed, some operators of these vessels have reported substantial energy losses – up to 50% thrust losses during offshore operations, in some instances. But while current technological practice to limit these losses dictates tilting the nozzle of the thruster downwards by four degrees, new research suggests greater reductions can be achieved by tilting the gear axis further to an angle of eight degrees. (Voith Turbo operates its own special gear machinery, so it is possible to tilt the propeller and nozzle axis in identical fashion.) It was found that an axis tilt of zero degrees,


losses could be as much as 45% of the generated thrust but by increasing the downward tilt, it was found that thrust losses reduced linearly


58 Voith Radial Propeller.


and removed underwater with the vessel afloat. Voith Turbo will deliver the first ship set of two VPR units for installation to a semi-submersible rig intended to be launched in 2011. Like Voith Turbo engineers, competing


counterparts at Rolls Royce have also been working to improve the energy efficiency of its propulsion systems. One is the use of hybrid propulsion, something the company has been promoting for many years and is now gaining full acceptance by ship operators; another is the development of individual products; but even mature products can be improved given the company’s up to date research facilities and use of the latest computational methods. For example, by redesigning the CP propeller


hub Rolls Royce has been able to optimise hydrodynamic and mechanical efficiency. Te results of this research is now manifest in the new S3 series of Kamewa waterjets, which can deliver increased thrust for the same power and less weight. Both are showing actual gains in service. Combining individual product


Promas to the fore.


up to a seven degree axis tilt. At an axis tilt of four degrees, losses equalled 28% but with an eight degree axis tilt thrust losses were significantly less at just 5% of generated thrust. Interestingly, greater tilt angles do not appear to lead to further improvements in efficiency. Based on the results of its research and the


service experience of those 1970s-built units still in operation, Voith Turbo is confident the new VPR 42-55 will be better placed to stand the test of time. A 5.5MW prototype unit, with a bollard pull of 100tonnes at dynamic positioning, is already in production at the German manufacturer’s Heidenheim works. Based on an L-drive arrangement with a


4200mm diameter fixed pitch propeller, it incorporates a special98 deg gear that transfers the vertical input shaſt to the propeller axes that tilted at eight degrees. It can be installed


improvements in optimised systems can be another route to saving fuel and reducing total emissions for a given amount of useful work done. Promas is a good illustration of this, applied to the stern of merchant vessels. In this Rolls-Royce system, Promas is an integration of the conventional propeller and rudder configuration of a typical single or twin screw vessel. A special hubcap is fitted to the propeller which smooths the flow on to a bulb that forms part of the rudder, while the spade rudder itself has a special shape with a twisted leading edge. The resulting improvement in efficiency is made up from several components. One is the reduced loss in the hub region of the propeller. Te second is that the shape of the rudder converts some of the swirl energy in the propeller slipstream, which is normally lost, into additional forward thrust. Te third component is that the shape of the rudder gives a much higher side force for a given rudder angle in the ±5 degree range normally used for course corrections. Te best results are achieved on blunt single screw vessels with a block coefficient greater


The Naval Architect July/August 2009


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88