This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Feature 1 | CRUISESHIP TECHNOLOGY


Figure 2. (includes Tables 3 and 4) Maximum squats in open water conditions.


there also are a few user-friendly short-cut formulae. Figure 1 indicates that she would go


aground at the stern in open water at a forward speed of 17.08knots. Te equation that I used is:


Table 2 Table 3 Maximum Squat = (CB x V2 ) / 100metres


in open water conditions. My short-cut formula over-predicts a few


cms on the high and therefore safe side. Figure 1 indicates that Queen Victoria


would go aground at the stern in a confined channel at a forward speed of 12.08knots. Tis lower speed when grounding shows the influence of adjacent riverbanks producing greater squats.


Maximum Squat = (CB x V2 ) / 50metres


in Confined Channel conditions. Again, this is a short-cut formula that I


have developed. It errs a few cms on the high and therefore safe side. Figure 1 portrays how the squats at each


sometimes refer it to being in restricted waters ie. restricted in water depth only. When a vessel is operating in water


with breadth restraints such as riverbanks or canal sides, she is said to be in confined channel conditions. As a ship proceeds along a river or canal the forces will be reflected from these banks back onto the vessel. Squat in confined channels can be over twice that measured in open water. Te width of influence is where the ship


changes from being in a confined channel to being in open water conditions. It can be given as a multiple of the vessel’s breadth moulded, perhaps later transposed to a distance in metres. Width of influence


28


changes with ship type and block co-efficient. See later notes.


Victoria’s squat curves . Figure 1 shows parabolic squat curves for when the Queen Victoria is in open water and in confined channel conditions. See maximum squat values in Table 3. Te (Cb) used is 0.600. It was assumed that when static, there


was a 1.75m under-keel clearance even keel, extending from her Bow to her Stern. Tere are many complicated detailed


formulae suggested by researchers for predicting maximum ship squat. However,


forward speed in a confined channel produce twice the squats for when Queen Victoria is in open water. Because the Cb < 0.700, all these maximum


squats are at the stern, Figure 2 illustrates what happens if the H/T


was changed to 1.20, to 1.30 and to 1.40 in open water conditions. See maximum squats in Table 3 and Table 4. Te higher the value the H/T, the less will be the corresponding squats. Maximum squats will vary directly with the inverse of H/T. Again, the Cb is 0.600. Figure 3 portrays the maximum squats


between the conditions of open water and confined channels for the Queen Victoria. Tis time H/T is 1.20, for example say (water


The Naval Architect February 2009


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92