search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FAST STATS


The KFF Covid-19 Vaccine Monitor, an ongoing research project by the Kaiser Family Foundation, tracks the public’s attitudes and experiences with Covid-19 vaccinations. The surveys were conducted October 14 - 24, 2021.


38% of adults surveyed said they believe the


government is exaggerating the number of Covid-19 deaths


18%


of adults surveyed said they believe that deaths resulting from Covid-19 vaccines are being intentionally hidden by the government.


of adults surveyed said they believe you can get Covid-19 from the vaccine.


14% 42%


of unvaccinated U.S. adults are age 30- 49. This represents the largest block of


unvaccinated U.S. adults during the survey period.


1 IN 5


adults who were either vaccine hesitant or resistant in June 2021 had received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccination by September 22, 2021.


1 IN 3


adults who received a fi rst Covid-19 vaccine dose between June 1 and Sept. 22, 2021 said that knowing someone who got seriously ill or died from the disease was a major reason they decided to get vaccinated.


39% of adults who received a fi rst Covid-19


vaccine dose between June 1 and Sept. 22, 2021 said the Delta variant was a major reason they decided to get vaccinated.


19% of adults who received a fi rst Covid-19


vaccine dose between June 1 and Sept. 22, 2021 said that social pressure from family and friends was a major reason they decided to get vaccinated.


https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/dashboard/kff-covid- 19-vaccine-monitor-dashboard/


Photo credit: Alekss | stock.adobe.com 6


NEWSWIRE


Where are America’s most cost-effi cient hospitals?  new analysis identifi es the most cost- effi cient hospitals in merica and high- lights how potentially billions of dollars could be saved in the nations Medicare program. he analysis from the own nstitute,


a healthcare think tank, uncovered big differences in the cost of care between hospitals, even those within the same city. he study analyed data from more


than , hospitals, looking at how much Medicare was billed and comparing that to how many patients died, both  and  days from admission. mong hospitals with average -day mortality rates, according to a own nsti- tute press release, costs ranged from , to , per patient. he study shows that if all hospitals matched the perfor- mance of the countrys most cost-effi cient hospitals, there would be  billion in Medicare savings each year.  most cost-effi cient hospitals in merica  Pinnacle ospital (Crown Point, )  Saint Marys Regional Medical Center (Reno, )


 Mercy Medical Center ubuque (ubuque, )


 Encino ospital Medical Center (Encino, C)


 Park Ridge ealth (endersonville, C)  Oroville ospital (Oroville, C)  Saint Michaels Medical Center (ewark, )


 UnityPoint ealth - Meriter (Madison, W)


 East iverpool City ospital (East iv- erpool, O)


 Maple rove ospital (Maple rove, M) he nstitute tracked Medicare patients hospitalied from - using claims data and adusted both mortality rates and cost based on patient risk. otal Medicare cost included claims from inpatient hos- pitaliations and post-discharge claims (hospice, skilled nursing facilities, etc). ospitals with the lowest mortality rates and lowest costs received the best scores on cost effi ciency. he study is part of the  own ospitals nde.  full methodology for the cost effi ciency rankings is available.


IAHCSMM adds federal lobbyist to help secure hazard pay for SPD professionals he nternational ssociation of ealth- care Central Service Materiel Management (CSMM) has oined forces with the ssociation of Surgical echnologists in hiring a federal lobbying fi rm, Mcllister


December 2021 • HEALTHCARE PURCHASING NEWS • hpnonline.com


 uinn, to help enact haard pay for ster- ile processors, surgical technologists and surgical assistants for their work during CO- in  and . Currently, the federal legislation does


not include sterile processors. he lobby- ing fi rm will work to add sterile proces- sors to the legislation along with trying to secure passage of the legislation. Sterile processors are important mem-


bers of the healthcare team and have played an increasingly critical role during the CO- pandemic. ot only are Sterile Processing technicians responsible for ensuring that equipment and instru- ments used during surgical procedures are properly decontaminated, cleaned, inspected, and sterilied prior to patient use, the pandemic has led a growing number of technicians to also become responsible for steriliing certain types of personal protective equipment under U.S. ood and rug dministrations emergency use authoriation. Sterile processors are high-risk health-


care workers and should be included in this legislation, said osephine M. Colacci, Esq., irector of overnment ffairs for CSMM. hese professionals have been responsible for steriliing some types of personal protective equipment, including  respirators therefore, there should be no doubt that sterile processors deserve haard pay for their efforts dur- ing the CO- pandemic. his is a great team effort by CSMM and the ssociation of Surgical echnologists to hire federal lobbying support.


Rankings announced for the Gartner Healthcare Supply Chain Top 25 for 2021 artner, nc. has released its th annual artner ealthcare Supply Chain op  ranking. o re ect growing maturity across the healthcare and life sciences sup- ply chain, the ranking now solely focuses on U.S. health systems. Were making the move to an all- healthcare-provider ranking because we recognie that the healthcare supply chain has made signifi cant progress in sie, scope and capabilities compared to when we started the ranking in , said Eric Oaffer, vice president analyst with the artner Supply Chain practice. his shift in methodology allows for more healthcare providers to be featured in the ranking and for a better distinction from our Supply Chain op  ranking, which is global and covers all industries. n this revamped ranking, Cleveland


Clinic takes the top spot with the highest overall peer and analyst opinion scores.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50