HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING
communication in a single wire over multiple wavelengths and they don’t interfere with each other. In a single waveguide I can send 16 or 32 channels, but maybe one day soon this will be increased to 128.
Columbia University g
GHz receivers, nanosecond scale switches all kinds of structures and we can do wave division multiplexing into these interconnect structures. The capabilities are just enormous.
What are the advantages of using optical communications? The advantage of the interconnect technology is that because of the low losses. We know from larger scale systems like fibre optics networks that optics is a great communication technology but the reason for this is twofold. One is that we can send the light over very long distances before we need to amplify it because the losses in the optical transmission waveguide can be very low – that helps with the power consumption. In electronics we have to regenerate the bits over much smaller distances. We can send optical light
over long distances without having to spend energy- without having to re amplify. It is independent of the data rate – whereas in electronics the higher the frequency, the higher the data rate the more power that is being expended. In the optical world the optical fibre carries 10 GB, 100GB or a TB and the energy that is dissipated is independent
of the frequency and the distance. In HPC the distances are much shorter, we are talking about communicating from chip to chip but the point is that in the optical domain its really all the same. Communicating across the chip and across the board or between racks is done with the same technology because I can send the light over these distances without having to regenerate it. Conversely, in the electronic world, you have to use a different technology with every distance. All those steps expend
energy and that is one of the reasons that, as soon as you get off the chip and off the board, your bandwidth diminishes substantially. In the optical domain it is all the same. In other words I can have very high bandwidth densities for short distances and the same exact technology for long distance. This opens up the possibility of having a much more flat architecture in terms of bandwidth communications. The other beautiful thing about optical communications is that fundamentally it is bosons and not fermions, so they do not interfere with each other. This means that we can put multiple lines of
10 Scientific Computing World June/July 2018
What is the potential for the technology? Obviously there has been quite a bit of progress both in terms of the technology development and the integration densities but the other part that happened and is just now coming to fruition is the ecosystem. If we fast- forward to today and we think about commercially including silicon photonics within these systems, what does it take to commercialise? It is the same ecosystem that needed to be developed for the semiconductor industry. We need to develop
everything from automated design tools for the layout of the chips, foundries that fabricate the integrated photonics similar to CMOS fabrication processes, we
“This opens up the possibility of having a much more flat architecture in terms of bandwidth communications”
need packaging, and this is just now coming to fruition worldwide. In the US, for example, this
institute started in 2016 it is called the American Institute for Manufacturing Photonics (AIM Photonics) and this was a huge investment of $600 million from the US government and the state of New York.
It builds on a 300mm CMOS
fabrication facility that is dedicated to photonics. That is the core of the institute, but there are other components there including all the other
major components of the ecosystem design tools and a packing facility that is currently being constructed. It is a challenging gap
between invention of new technology, as good as it may be, and deploying it. There are similar initiatives happening in Europe and in the Far East (primarily in Singapore). In HPC we want to increase
performance but we want to do it within a power envelope. It is trying to increase performance while still maintaining this power envelope. For datacentres (DC) I think
there is less emphasis on power consumption so it is really about performance and at the DC market it is really driven by cost and so at this point in time the optics are still more expensive than electronics so DC use the optics at the locations in the DC where higher bandwidth or longer distances are needed. It is kind of interesting
because it is kind of the opposite to CMOS. While CMOS fabrication is very expensive, or at least the infrastructure to do that is very expensive in optics the fabrication is actually not that expensive relatively speaking. It is really the packaging whereas in CMOS the packaging is very cheap. The inclusion of the laser
source in the package is not a completely solved standard problem at this point. The packaging challenge is how you have chip that has both an optical and an electronics I/O all together in a commercial, low cost product. Lots of groups and
companies are working at it but it is not a done deal. There are multiple approaches at the moment in silicon photonics. Do you integrate the laser onto a silicon platform? Do you use an external laser? All those questions are being dealt with but I think we are not too far from converging to a more standard solution. We are maybe two years away from a pretty standardised solution.
@scwmagazine |
www.scientific-computing.com
Valerii Iavtushenk/
Shutterstock.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32
