Industry view – GLIL Infrastructure

Ted Frith is chief operating officer of GLIL Infrastructure, an LGPS-backed £2.3bn fund



Build Back Better. I expect we will hear a lot more of that phrase as focus turns from epidemiology to the economy. Encourag- ingly, infrastructure appears to be at the forefront of government intervention with the launch of a new National Infrastruc- ture Bank as central to Britain’s future. It is not news that the government was moving to set up an institution that could help drive capital into the sector. Until the Budget, however, detail had been thin. The private sector has been, understandably, keen to learn more about how the National Infrastructure Bank would shape up in terms of funding the transformation of our nation’s infrastructure and economy. While there was only a brief mention of the bank in the recent budget, the new policy design paper offers significant fur- ther guidance.

The paper makes clear the National Infra- structure Bank’s objectives and far-reach- ing role in the market. We now know that it will not only back regional projects, but also other large complex projects that need

significant investment to get off the ground. A determination to get new projects started is important. In recent years, there has been a transition in ownership of major infrastructure assets. As funds like ours invest in utilities, renewable energy, ports and logistics, and train rolling stock, the profile and nature of owner investors has changed. Where once ownership structures were dominated by sovereign wealth funds and specialist private equity, now it is investors with long investment horizons are the most prevalent and taking an active role. While this has helped create a better align- ment between investors and the infra- structure assets they support, it has also meant that there is a considerable amount of capital trying to find a home in a limited number of investment opportunities. By using the government’s investment power to get projects going, the bank’s aim is to create more opportunities for pension funds to invest directly into infra- structure, which means more stable, long- term returns for millions of pensioners. This supports the government’s stated desire to involve pension fund capital in funding infrastructure, not least as it acknowledges positive impact on out- comes that arise from involving institu- tional investors. The expectation is that the government can then offload its risk to institutional investors and recycle the cap- ital into new projects, creating a sustaina- ble funding source for generations to come. Yet, I was surprised by some of the nega- tive reaction to the announcement. There are legitimate challenges for more detail and a greater focus on tackling climate

change, however many have bemoaned the scale of the investment being made. I take an optimistic view. This is a significant improvement on the £3bn of capital that was first allocated to the Green Investment Bank in 2012. Now we are talking £22bn of financial capacity – £12bn for lending and investment and a further £10bn of guarantees. This gives the bank immediate clout to get projects off the ground. It also acknowledges the need to use the capital efficiently and for the benefit of taxpayers.

Beyond the financial commitment, the most important development for me is the spirit in which the announcement is made. It reaffirmed the government’s commit- ment to work closely with pension funds, which the chancellor sees as a key ally in funding and achieving its ambitions. The bank’s inception will help foster mutually beneficial collaboration between the public and private sector, meaning the capital associated with the new bank should not be seen in isolation. It means using public money smartly to develop infrastructure by leveraging private sector funds and tapping into the strong out- comes that can be delivered by private cap- ital – a clear objective of the chancellor. This is about creating a triangle of interde- pendent needs – those of local communi- ties, the government and our nation of tax- payers and pension savers. No doubt, there is much more work to be done. For now, let’s embrace the opportunity to work together and to build back better.

Publisher portfolio Verlag Office 5.08 – 5th floor Fleet House 8 –12 New Bridge Street London EC4V 6AL +44 (0)20 7822 8522

Editor Mark Dunne

Deputy editor Mona Dohle

Acting deputy editor Andrew Holt 12 | portfolio institutional | April 2021 | issue 102

Publisher John Waterson

Head of sales Clarissa Huber

Marketing manager Tabitha Tebbatt

Head of roundtables Mary Brocklebank

Sales and marketing executive Silvia Silvestri

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56