Discussion – DC Multi Asset
safe, but to do that within the charge cap is challenging. Stewart: We have made progress towards that. We have target-date fund approaches that expand to and beyond retirement. But for me, there are two bits needed to make that happen, which would make a huge difference in terms of value. One is that most individuals who want to take an income in retirement end up in a situation where they move from an insti- tutional world into a retail one. And there is an upfront advisory cost and ongoing costs of hundreds of basis points a year. They are not in an institutional world, so maybe there is a debate around the level of governance rigour around the process and the quality of investments available. DC master trusts have the potential to do more for members and will have the ben- efit of scale going forward. To me, an obvious value improvement we can make is to default at that point. If an individual does not make an active choice, they would remain invested and can draw on what they have built up. To me, it does not make much sense to build up assets in one vehicle and then sell them to buy similar assets in another vehicle to then draw on and pay more for the privilege.
Fearn: Or to put it in cash. Stewart: The other point is that annuitisa- tion in later life, which is going to require an intervention from the individual, becomes tricky. Longer term, I can see a market for deferred annuities. Fearn: That is what we are working towards, but it is not there yet. Stewart: Agreed, we don’t have the scale yet.
North: Callum, how are you thinking about DC portfolio construction? Stewart: We need to strive for much better than we currently have. The impact of the environment we operate in today with an emphasis on cost is so constraining in terms of potential outcome. Most trustees we speak to tend to support the idea that more freedom would be helpful to deploy different beliefs. If you look at the outcome differential we could have through a more unconstrained approach, within the master trust market the difference in retirement outcomes from worst to best is as wide as a 60% range for younger savers. That is within the cost constrained world. Price points sit within a range of 10 basis points differ- ence from lowest to highest, so headline strategy still drives outcomes. If we were to increase that by 10 basis
points, we could improve retirement out- comes by well over 10% for younger indi- viduals. If we could increase the price point by 20 basis points we could increase retirement outcomes by well over 20% for those individuals. If we can introduce sophistication in the later
stages, we could help avoid the issues we had last year where we are reli- ant on a constrained range of generally cheaper asset classes. We just can’t rely on a constrained universe to provide the diversification we need. So where should it go? I would have less reliance on traditional markets, specifical- ly within bonds. Also, DC schemes gener- ally under deploy to real assets such as infrastructure and real estate. There tend to be small and listed allocations to prop- erty and infrastructure rather than access to the physical underlying asset. We can do more there to diversify and offer long- term inflation protection. But the crucial missing piece of the puz- zle, given the completely different eco- nomic regime we are moving into – I say different because we don’t know what it will look like in five years’ time – is that we need to bring relevant expertise closer to the investment decisions. This means we need to carefully select fund managers
Providers are con- strained because we know at the end of the story there is going to
be pressure on cost. Callum Stewart
Head of DC investment Hymans Robertson
38 | portfolio institutional | September 2023 | Issue 126
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52