search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Technology


Step by step


There are so many areas which demand our attention to make sailing as a whole more sustainable. However why not start in the most obvious place... by simply looking up?


We like to assume that sailing is inherently sustainable, powered by renewable energy. Sails themselves, however, are the elephant in the room when it comes to sustainability. It takes a lot of energy to make sailcloth and the raw materials required to achieve the extreme levels of stretch resistance, strength and durability that we rely on for efficient sailing are inherently unsustainable. Or rather, they were. Last November Dimension- Polyant’s Hydra Net radial was the first sailcloth on the market to become 100 per cent climate neutral. And the even better news for sailors and sailmakers is that there’s no change at all in its performance. So what has changed? First, Dimension-Polyant has worked hard over many years to get its own house in order and those efforts have come to fruition. Both of its factories, at Kempen in Germany and Putnam in Connecticut, USA were certified as climate neutral production plants in 2021. That isn’t just greenwash. Their carbon footprint calculation is all-inclusive, not just based on energy, water and waste. Things like business travel and staff commuting are also factored in, and unavoidable emissions are offset by certificates from recognised climate projects such as Plastic Free Oceans. The fact that it’s certified by a reputable independent assessor, Climate Partner, is also significant. The second big change is that a bio-based version of Dyneema yarn, one of the key raw materials in Hydra Net radial, has become available. ‘Ever since I joined the company 13 years ago we’ve been looking for better, more environmentally friendly materials,’ says Dimension-Polyant’s UK head of sales, Ben Rogers. ‘Unfortunately, until recently while


62 SEAHORSE


there have been alternative materials, the technical specification hasn’t been good enough to use in our sailcloth. That’s the wall we’ve been hitting but it’s changing very fast. Now we’re able to say that we’ve tried really hard and we’ve actually got somewhere, this is officially climate neutral.’ How can we be sure that the performance of the new, climate- neutral Hydra Net radial really is exactly the same as the trusted original? Because the two versions are physically identical and made in the same process. It starts with naphtha, the raw ingredient used to make ethylene, which is the first step in the production chain for all ultra- high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibres such as Dyneema. Instead of running two separate manufacturing processes in parallel DSM, the maker of Dyneema, uses a blend of bio-based naphtha (recovered from the wood pulp industry) and fossil fuel-based naphtha to make ethylene. They haven’t stopped using fossil fuel-based naphtha simply because they can’t source enough bio- based naphtha to replace it. They then use a mass-balancing approach to divide their production into two parts, which are sold as bio-based Dyneema and regular Dyneema, based on the proportions of bio-naphtha and fossil- fuel naphtha that went into the blend at the beginning. So whichever version of Dyneema you choose, bio or non- bio, its technical specifications can’t be anything but identical. What difference does it make? The carbon footprint for a kilo of fossil fuel-based Dyneema is 14.4kg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e); for bio- based Dyneema it’s 35 per cent lower, at 9.4kg CO2e. And the generic UHMWPE that’s sold as a cheaper alternative has a carbon footprint


Above: very high levels of stretch resistance, strength and durability combined with light weight make Hydra Net one of the world’s most popular woven


sailcloths – plus it’s the only such cloth on the market that is 100 per cent climate neutral. Right: the new version of Hydra Net is physically identical to the trusted original in every way


typically 29kg or four times higher than bio-based Dyneema. What about the other materials that go into Hydra Net radial? ‘The next challenge is to replace the polyester fibres with recycled or bio- based alternatives,’ Rogers says. ‘How far off that is, we’re unsure at the moment, but we’re working on it.’ Dimension-Polyant is also focusing some R&D resources on end-of-life recycling solutions. ‘It’s difficult for sailcloth because you have to separate the components,’ Rogers explains. ‘You could recycle the films but you have to get the adhesives off and separate the yarns. In the UK I’ve spoken to lots of recycling people. They all said yes, bring your samples, we can do it. Every single one came back and said no. So there’s a lot to learn.’ Dimension-Polyant is also working with a German university on upcycling solutions for sailcloth that don’t involve taking it apart. So has the price of Hydra Net radial increased as a result? Yes and no. Dimension-Polyant’s costs have gone up, but at the moment they haven’t passed those costs on to their customers.


www.dimension-polyant.com q


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124