search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
18 


 


Jonathan Pearson at Residentially argues that if we want to protect children’s wellbeing   policy might all be needed...


Development space is always at a premium, particularly on smaller urban sites where every planning requirement has an impact on how many properties can be built. The new second staircase mandate


in taller buildings is one example. While tougher safety standards are non-negotiable, some housebuilders have warned it could result in 90,000  the equivalent of a small city. There is a similar, but perhaps less


widely understood, issue around the rules governing outdoor space in new developments, and how those requirements can increase as the proportion of affordable housing rises. Again, the principle is almost


impossible to argue with. We all need easy access to good-quality outdoor space, and this is particularly important for families with children and for people living in denser parts of our cities, where private gardens may not be available.


The Greater London Authority’s


Population Yield Calculator is one of the tools used to help determine how much space new schemes in the capital need to set aside for children’s play areas and other communal uses, often referred to in planning as amenity space. It estimates how many people, including children, are likely to live in a proposed development using factors such as the sizes of the homes and whether they will be affordable or sold on the open market. The greater the proportion of affordable


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44