Feature: Industrial and agricultural electronics


Industrial automation and smart


agriculture technology crossover By Shammi Thakur, Research Director, Vyansa Intelligence


E


lectronics designed for factory automation rarely operate under conditions where every milliwatt, every wireless transmission and every exposed connector


influences long-term system reliability. Connected farming changes that equation. Sensor nodes must remain operational for months across fields, orchards and vineyards, whilst enduring moisture, dust, vibration and fluctuating temperatures with little or no human intervention. Industrial-grade electronics continue


to influence agricultural system design, but direct adaptation rarely delivers reliable field performance. Every design layer, including power management, wireless connectivity, component packaging and environmental protection, must account for constraints seldom encountered inside factories. Component selection therefore becomes an exercise in balancing energy efficiency, durability, communication reliability and service life instead of maximising computational capability alone.


Factory automation to farming Factory automation and connected farming rely on many of the same embedded technologies, yet operating conditions demand fundamentally different hardware decisions. Continuous power, controlled environments and scheduled maintenance allow industrial systems to optimise for performance and deterministic control. Field-deployed electronics instead prioritise operational lifetime, environmental resilience and minimal human intervention; see Table 1. Engineering priorities shiſt from


maximising processing capability to extending operational lifetime and reducing maintenance requirements. For example,


integrated MCUs reduce board complexity by combining processing, memory and wireless communication. Ultra-low-power circuitry extends battery life during long sleep cycles. Modular sensor interfaces simplify deployment across multiple crop and environmental conditions. Also, reduced connector count lowers corrosion risk and improves long-term reliability. Recent precision viticulture


deployments adopted exactly this approach, combining ARM Cortex-M microcontrollers, LoRa communication and integrated solar charging into compact monitoring nodes capable of operating across multiple growing seasons with minimal maintenance.


Table 1: Key differences influencing hardware architecture


30 November 2026 www.electronicsworld.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44