search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FEATURE FOOD & BEVERAGE


How to avoid metal contamination in ready meal production


In practice, this means you eliminate it at the cheapest part of the process, but also you catch it before the metal is chopped up and dispersed into multiple products. Manufacturers may optimise performance by


installing several metal detectors positioned at critical control points throughout the process, rather than a single, big ‘catch-all’ detector at the end of the line. Utilising upstream metal detection can also identify smaller contaminants which may not be possible at the end of the line system. HACCP guidance states that critical control points (CCPs) should be located at any step where hazards can be prevented, eliminated, or reduced to acceptable levels.


Fortress Interceptor


Ever-changing consumer tastes mean that most products today contain several ingredients and flavourings sourced from multiple suppliers. Ready meal manufacturers are challenged with demands for transparency in sourcing ingredients to create shortcut recipes, while maintaining food safety across their production lines


M


anufacturers are now facing new challenges due to increasingly complex supply chains.


Evolving issues regarding product recall regulations present growing risks to food manufacturers across Europe. When sourcing ingredients for ready meals from multiple suppliers, manufacturers must consider the finances, time, and manpower required to devote to effective risk management. Greater pressure means food safety standards are


being compromised, explains Phil Brown of Fortress Technology Europe. Based on recent figures from the RPC, recalls of unsafe food products in the UK have jumped by 40 per cent from 145 to 203 in the last year. Although allergy-related concerns dominate these figures, a sharp increase in metal contaminants continues to take prevalence.


RISKS ON THE RISE The rising percentage of recalls implies regulations and current systems for food safety aren’t totally aligned with changes in increasingly automated food production. Meanwhile consumers are more connected and social media adds greater pressure on food manufacturers to list ingredient sources. Given that brand reputation is more important


than ever and cutting corners on safety could be an expensive mistake in the long term, Brown


10 DECEMBER/JANUARY 2020 | IRISH MANUFACTURING


highlights the importance of strategic planning when selecting food inspection checkpoints to optimise detection lines. Since investment in inspection systems by food


factories is predicted to continue, risk professionals should constantly revisit inspection protocols and hypothetical contamination scenarios to look at potential holes in the security chain.


CONVENIENCE WITHOUT CONTAMINANTS Brown says: “With an average ready meal, there can be more than eight production steps between sourcing ingredients to packing, and more than five different product components each requiring, cleaning, peeling and inspection, slicing, cooking, quality inspection, flavouring and finally weighing and packing." Brown advises to take a step back and look at


each processing point, the equipment that’s being used, and every possible scenario. Revisit this constantly, and don’t wait for a crisis to hit before developing your recall response. “Although most external companies supplying ingredients are extremely diligent, the more extensive a supply chain and the further inspection equipment is pushed up the line up, the greater the risks”. Operating a metal detector to catch a


contaminant in its largest form is generally viewed as the best method to avoid costly waste.


FINDING THE RIGHT SOLUTION For dry ingredients, e.g. uncooked rice or flour, processors will often install a large gravity style inspection configuration upstream. With wet raw ingredients, i.e. meat, a conveyor metal detector would often be installed at the start of the processing line to identify any ferrous or non- ferrous metals, such as stainless steel. This ensures that no metal is fed into the grinder where it could damage equipment and also be fragmented into smaller parts that are more difficult to detect and remove. Once processed, liquid, paste, and soft meats


are often passed through a pipeline metal detector prior to mixing with other ingredients. At the final stage, filled and sealed ready meals can then be passed individually or in bulk through a conveyor metal detector aperture. A metal detector that can run multiple


frequencies simultaneously, such as the Fortress Interceptor, is ideal for these types of elevated convenience products, as it can accurately inspect a variety of conductivities at the same time. Conquering the longstanding challenge of ‘product effect’ caused by moisture in meat, poultry, seafood, and even vegan ready meals, the Interceptor not only increases inspection sensitivity, but also helps to eliminate false rejects. Many manufacturers disregard the value of


optimised metal detector systems to their business. However, zero recalls in the past doesn’t mean a ready meal manufacturer is immune to future threats. “Rather than considering the ‘if’ it can be prudent to think instead about the ‘when’,” concludes Brown. Manufacturers of convenience foods incorporate


multiple ingredients from numerous suppliers. Vigilance is essential to offset financial damage from waste as well as protecting brand reputation. To mitigate further contaminant risks, the decision to invest in high quality inspection equipment will pay dividends in the long run.


Fortress Technology Europe www.fortresstechnology.com


/ IRISHMANUFACTURING


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44