search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Catch here


Designing out safety risks


It’s been nearly 200 years since Britain’s fi rst railroad was constructed to connect Stockton to Darlington for the transportation of minerals. Since then, rail transportation has evolved at a rapid pace and now faster, greener and safer trains travel in larger numbers across the nation every day. How exactly does technology enhance rail safety? Here, Simone Bruckner, managing director at power resistor manufacturer Cressall Resistors, explains the safety mechanisms protecting the UK’s tracks


T


he modern British railway still heavily relies on the initial Victorian engineering at the heart of its development, with a few modernising tweaks along the way. Despite the age of its basic infrastructure, the UK’s rail network is considered one of the safest in Europe, according to the European Union Agency for Railways. Today, the safety of the railways is ensured through a combination of traditional engineering principles, and new technology.


The need for safe speed


the number of Train Protection and Warning System (TPWS) activations triggered by over speeding was still 171 last fi scal year, according to data from the RSSB. In addition to the risk of over speeding, as technology advances, trains will continue to get faster and faster. Engineers are constantly developing new designs to enable quicker journeys without compromising on safety or comfort — several trains are now in operation across the globe that travel at over 250 miles per hour (mph).


However, faster trains also bring an increased safety risk that must be mitigated through design. The energy demand involved in decelerating high-speed trains is so large that disk brakes alone are insuffi cient to guarantee safety. This is why rail typically implements dynamic braking mechanisms in addition to mechanical braking.


Undeniably, the design and engineering behind trains and the tracks is the most essential factor safeguarding the network. The Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB) has identifi ed over speeding and lack of effective speed controls as a key risk to passenger and operator safety. Although the instances of over speeding are decreasing year on year,


www.cieonline.co.uk Reliable braking control


By using an electric motor as a generator to dissipate excess energy, dynamic braking can facilitate regenerative braking. Within the rail industry, this means that when a train decelerates, excess energy is either transmitted through overhead wires for immediate reuse by other trains on the


network or it is stored onboard using a battery for later use.


Regenerative braking is only a viable option when there are other trains in close proximity, such as on underground lines, or the battery is not fully charged. If neither of these circumstances apply, it may not be possible to use all of the regenerated power. Removing this excess energy from the system is essential to prevent damage to other components in the power circuit of the train that could lead to complete system failure. A braking resistor is required to safely dissipate excess energy as heat, keeping the train’s power system operational.


keeping our rail systems safe in the modern era — digital tools are also key to a reliable rail infrastructure.


Cressall has supplied resistors to the transport sector for over 60 years and remains at the forefront of resistor technology. The EV2 advanced water-cooled resistor is specifi cally designed for heavy-duty applications like rail traction. Its unique modular design means up to fi ve modules can be combined to handle up to 125 kilowatts (kW) per unit. Several units can be installed, in parallel or in series, to meet higher power requirements with no upper limit. The unit is proven to meet all major shock and vibration standards required for rail traction applications.


Safeguarding a train’s braking system is an essential mechanism to ensuring rail safety, but traditional engineering is not the only step to


Modernising old infrastructure The British rail system has kept same infrastructure since its creation in the Victorian era, and some elements are crying out for an upgrade. Although this infrastructure was built to be durable, there is room to improve operational safety through digital tools. The RSSB accounts twelve per cent of all train accident risks to infrastructural failures, which are often exacerbated by poor weather conditions such as high winds and heavy rainfall. The risk of derailment and collisions is becoming increasingly rare, but implementing further mechanisms is crucial to achieving optimum safety performance on the tracks. When considering how train speeds are increasing, relying on human judgement alone is insuffi cient and unsafe for trains driving at 250 miles per hour and over. Implementing digital tools to assist train operators ensures there is no room for human error, improving safety performance. For example, connected driver advisory systems (C-DAS) optimise a train’s driving style to adhere to the schedules timing, improving driver guidance and reducing operational incidents.


Rail is easily one of the most effi cient ways of travelling across Britain, and will only become more reliable with improvements to operations. Combining old with new enables rail design engineers to combine the benefi ts of tradition with innovation, for faster, greener, and crucially, safer transportation.


cressall.com Components in Electronics June 2021 25


Rail


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54