search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COVER STORY


Successfully Integrating MEMS Accelerometers into High Precision Applications


Dr Panos Ioakim, Field Applications Engineer at Anglia M 8 June 2021


EMS accelerometers have evolved to deliver high performance in a small footprint at relatively low cost. They are available in numerous varieties and diverse specifications making them suitable for wide range


of applications, from ultra-low power wearables, to high bandwidth condition monitoring. With their ever-increasing capability, they are now on the verge of challenging their much more expensive and physically larger counterparts who have long been established in industry as the golden standard. Dr Panos Ioakim, Field Applications Engineer at Anglia, discusses their characteristics and gives an insight into overcoming the design challenges for the successful integration of MEMS accelerometers into instrument grade products. Selecting a MEMS accelerometer for an application primarily involves making decisions based on dynamic range, bandwidth of operation, current consumption, number of axes, sensitivity, and noise density. With over 50 different products currently


Components in Electronics


available from Analog Devices offering a wide variety of operational characteristics and capabilities, selecting the appropriate device requires a methodical selection process. Aiding this selection process, MEMS Inertial Sensors Selection Tables are available on the Analog Devices website, providing product segmentation by application, as is a more detailed parametric Product Selection Table, offering finer selection by attribute. Since the selection process is mostly informed by target application criteria however, arriving at an appropriate list of parts is by no means a daunting exercise. For static operations such as tilt measurement for example, the focus would typically be on devices with low bandwidth, low dynamic range and good noise and sensitivity characteristics, yielding a selection of devices such as the ADXL103, ADXL203, and the ADIS16003, to mention but a few. Worth noting is that for some applications, highly integrated solutions also exist, for example the ADIS16203 inclinometer able to provide out-of-the-box 0.025° resolution, offering a quick time to market. For high resolution specialist applications, the ADXL354 and ADXL355 offer superior performance with noise densities down to 22.5µg/√Hz over analogue and digital outputs respectively.


For mixed dynamic and static applications such as bio-sensing wearables, prosthetics and patient monitoring where a larger dynamic range and bandwidth are required at the lowest power consumption possible, the focus would mainly be on the micro-power range of devices, such as the ADXL362 and ADXL363 which outperform in this area, offering 200Hz bandwidth and up to 8g at just 3uA operational current, whilst also incorporating 270nA motion- activated wake up and 10nA standby modes. Conversely, for applications requiring wide bandwidths and higher dynamic ranges, the ADXL100X series would be aptly suited, offering bandwidths up to 24 kHz on fast analogue outputs, whilst for lower bandwidths, the digital output ADCMXL1021-1 would suit applications to 10 kHz. For products specifically employing frequency domain analysis, more specialised modules are also available, such as the ADIS16228 which


provides on-chip tri-axial FFT, storage, and a flat frequency response up to 5 kHz.


Although selecting the correct device for an application based on specific performance criteria is important, integrating a chosen device successfully into a product is critical for high precision applications as it requires careful management of the many inherent characteristics of these sensors.


Fig. 1 MEMs internal inertial structure


MEMS accelerometers are predominantly based on the physical properties of the mass-spring topology, where an inertial micro-mass is suspended by a set of polysilicon springs and is free to move within limits determined by the physical geometry of the sensor, in one, two, or three dimensions (Fig. 1). Fingers extending from the inertial mass locate between fingers fixed to the substrate in a mesh to create movable differential capacitive elements in each axis. Accelerations in the x or y directions in this example, induce a force upon the inertial mass resulting in a motion relative to the fixed substrate, thus offsetting the fingers within the mesh from


www.cieonline.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54