FEATURE Industrial AI
ADAPTING TO ‘PERPETUAL MOTION’
In this Q&A, Adolfo Gomez Sanchez, CEO of Gold Results, speaks about leadership, adaptability, AI, performance and the capabilities that will define successful organisations in the years ahead
B
usiness leaders have always faced disruption. What feels different today is the pace, scale and frequency of change. From AI and workforce
transformation to geopolitical uncertainty and shifting customer expectations, organisations are navigating multiple forms of disruption at once. A recent Financial Times article described this environment as one of “perpetual motion”, where leaders must adapt to continual change rather than occasional periods of turbulence. Success increasingly depends on an organisation’s ability to learn, evolve and perform in uncertain conditions. Adolfo Gomez Sanchez believes
organisations need to rethink not only how they manage change, but how they build cultures capable of thriving through it. Q1: Some business leaders describe their
environment as one of “perpetual motion” and continual disruption. Does that resonate with your own experience as a CEO, and how has your approach to leadership evolved as a result? A: Absolutely. In fact, I would argue that the defining characteristic of modern business is not simply change, but the accelerating pace of change.
Markets have always evolved. Competitors have always emerged. New technologies have always disrupted established ways of working. What feels different today is how many forms of disruption are happening simultaneously and how quickly they are reshaping the landscape around us.
Artificial intelligence is the most obvious example, but it is far from the only one. Geopolitical shifts, changing trade relationships, supply chain volatility and economic uncertainty are all forcing leaders to re-evaluate assumptions that may have remained stable for decades.
The challenge is that human beings are wired for stability. When uncertainty increases and our sense of control diminishes, anxiety rises. Teams look to leaders in the same way families look to parents or tribes look to elders. They want confidence, perspective and reassurance. Leaders do not need to have every answer. They do need the ability to remain
20 September 2026 | Automation
grounded when others are anxious and create conditions for people to move forward despite uncertainty. Q2: Another theme dominating leadership conversations is that change is no longer about implementing new tools but transforming behaviours. Why do organisations often focus on technology before people, and what are the consequences of getting that balance wrong? A: Technology is seductive because it
promises immediate results. Whether it is improving profitability, learning a new skill or adopting AI, there is a tendency to look for a silver bullet. The reality is that organisations are built
around people. An idea alone has very little value unless there are people capable of consistently and effectively executing at world- class level. We have seen this pattern repeatedly.
Years ago, it was ERP systems. Then it was blockchain. Then the Internet of Things. Now it is AI. The question leaders should be asking is not how technology can replace teams. It is how technology can support teams and amplify their strengths. Q3: The rapid rise of AI is forcing many
organisations to rethink how work gets done. Beyond the technology itself, what do you believe is the biggest leadership challenge AI creates? A: One of the biggest mistakes organisations make is treating AI as a technology project rather than a leadership challenge. The first issue is designing the right
relationship between humans and AI. Every organisation has unique strengths, capabilities and ways of creating value. The optimal balance between human judgement, AI
automation and human-AI collaboration will differ from one organisation to another and one function or use case to another. The second challenge is that AI often exposes weaknesses that already exist. The third challenge is wellbeing and adaptation. Every major change initiative creates uncertainty. Employees naturally wonder what technology means for their role, their future and their value to the organisation. Leaders who ignore those concerns create
resistance, doubt, and allow fear to grow amid the silence. Leaders who address them openly create trust. Q4: Has the time come for leaders to move
from a commanding style to an enabling one? If so, what does an enabling leader look like in practice, and why is this shift becoming more important? A: I would argue that this shift is long
overdue. One of the biggest misconceptions in leadership is the belief that a small group of senior executives can genuinely control large organisations. The reality is that control is often an illusion. I once heard budgeting expert Bjarte Bogsnes explain this brilliantly through the analogy of traffic lights and roundabouts. Traffic lights represent command-and-control leadership. A central authority decides when everyone moves and stops, based on historical data. A roundabout works differently. Everyone understands the rules, adapts in real time and manages themselves within a shared framework. The roundabout is more efficient because people closest to the situation can make decisions quickly. An enabling leader understands this.
automationmagazine.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40
