FEATURE Electronics manufacturing
WHO INSPECTS THE INSPECTION SYSTEMS?
Edgar Wuchrer, Business Development EMEA - Vision Technology, Kistler, says increasing automation in quality control requires self-monitoring inspection systems
A
utomated inspection systems ensure that everything runs smoothly without human intervention. But who checks the
quality inspection systems? With increasing automation, the machine can and must monitor itself more and more. This requires a sophisticated strategy for inspection process reliability. It ensures that every inspection step runs smoothly, even in very short cycle times and in complex processes. Just a few years ago, employees were
largely responsible for quality control. However, due to fatigue during long and late individual employees or other circumstances, they often represented a source of error themselves. By integrating in-line inspection systems for 100% inspection, manufacturers are now increasingly freeing up employee capacity for more demanding tasks while maintaining product and inspection quality at a consistent level. But who checks whether the machine itself is becoming a source of error?
Testing & safety To ensure that the individual inspection as required and that no produced part leaves the line untested, manufacturing companies need a strategy for both the
testing and the safety of the process. To achieve this, the interaction between the individual components and inspection steps consequences if one of the process steps fails.
4000 parts per minute An example from the inline inspection of series-produced components using the Kistler KVC 621 SE optical quality inspection system illustrates what such a concept might look like. This compact testing system for punched metal components can perform an optical inspection of up to 4,000 parts per minute to check for dimensional accuracy and surface defects such as scratches or dents. Up to three integrated camera stations take pictures of the test part, the image processing software KiVision takes over the evaluation. Thanks to the tightly knit design for inspection process reliability, it ensures that every part is inspected even at high cycle rates. The built-in camera stations and the software for image processing are connected by the programmable logic controller (PLC). The PLC initiates the individual steps such as the recording of the test piece, the data transfer and the evaluation by the image processing software KiVision. It also checks the communication between the individual components. The camera, for example, sends the signal to the PLC when an image has been taken and transmits it to the image processing software.
At this point, a problem can arise that computer users know only too well: parallel processes slow down data processing. If the camera delivers a new inspection
28 February 2026 | Automation
image before the inspection of the last image has been completed, it can put additional strain on the software. In such cases, the PLC detects that the expected feedback is not being provided, stops the system and issues an error message to the operators, including the cause of the error. This ensures that its status as OK or NOK. Another typical source of error when testing punched parts in endless strips is the removal of NOK parts from the strip using a stamp. Here, it is subsequently removed. Therefore, sensors monitor the up and down movement of the stamp to check its end position. An additional laser light barrier is also used to ensure that the NOK part has actually been separated – after all, a stamp stroke does not necessarily mean that a part has been separated.
Ensuring a smooth process When designing systems and the associated inspection processes, a wide range of potential come to light. Individual requirements are almost always hidden in production processes which become increasingly complex with a higher level of automation. To ensure a smooth process, it is therefore important to analyse, implement and secure all crucial process and quality assurance steps accordingly. For the Kistler Group, such considerations are part of every system design, as a failure mode and of the design process. During this process, possible and evaluated. If necessary, the experts develop appropriate solutions.
Kistler Group
www.kistler.com
automationmagazine.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40
