search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FEATURE PCB testing


AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH TO TESTING


Choon-Hin Chang, Product Manager, Keysight Technologies, explains how to optimise the testing process during the high-volume manufacture of low complexity PCBs


E


lectronics have become ubiquitous today, with the emergence of connected products integrated into various aspects of our lives, such as internet of things (IoT) devices, consumer medical devices, and automotive electronics. These products share a common characteristic — high-volume productions, yet low  challenge for manufacturers in keeping up with the production rate while testing boards at scale, necessitating a more cost-  these products at scale. Manufacturers are under pressure to


revamp their manufacturing processes, reduce costs, and improve production timelines to meet the increasing demand for electronic devices. Consequently, the in-circuit testing processes applied to these products must also adapt and align with these dynamic industry demands. The imperative now is to produce


electronics at a lower cost and achieve  multifaceted challenge encompasses streamlining manufacturing processes, trimming operational costs, and accelerating production cycles. This approach necessitates an intricate interplay of innovative methodologies and advanced technologies that optimises the in-circuit testing procedures needed for ensuring the quality and functionality of electronic products.


One key aspect of ensuring high-quality


production of low-complexity printed circuit boards (PCBs) hinges on the testing process, which is crucial for boards that  programming. The conventional testing protocol for such boards typically involves multiple test stations, encompassing  and functional testing. However, this methodology is unsuitable for high- volume production due to its constraints on test throughput and the high costs associated with multiple test stations. One way to overcome testing challenges is to adopt the PCB panelisation manufacturing technique. Using highly


32 February 2025 | Automation


panelised boards has become a common technique in manufacturing, improving throughput and increasing production volumes. Low-cost electronics are also usually smaller and lower in complexity, so multiples  manageable size.


In PCB panelisation, manufacturers create one board from several boards and assemble them to form a single array. This technique  boards into a panel of manageable size, making  assembly line. The boards that make up the panel enable operators to load just one panel to test all boards simultaneously. During the breakout process following assembly, the panel divides into separate PCBs, a procedure known as depanelisation. The individual boards can be readily depanelised or separated from the array for packaging or installation into products. Assembly of low-complexity boards in


production is often rapid, necessitating quick turnaround times for testing to meet the production rate.


Examples of high-volume, low-complexity


board devices across various industries: • Automotive electronics • Medical devices • IoT devices • Mobile devices


Some advantages of PCB panelisation include saving time and money, improving  increasing output. A parallel test method enables testing multiple boards simultaneously. This approach of parallel panel testing facilitates in-circuit tests to meet high-volume production demands 


For example, if a single board takes six seconds to test, meeting the high-volume production demands necessitates a throughput of four boards every six seconds, totalling


2,400 boards per hour. To achieve the necessary throughput, the manufacturer faces two options: • Purchase four testers, which would demand  • Invest in a single tester capable of testing all four boards in parallel Testing four boards sequentially using one tester would require four times the single-board test time, totalling 16 seconds. However, testing four boards in parallel reduces the overall test time to approximately six seconds. This method represents a test time savings of 10 seconds over the testing of four boards sequentially. High-volume, low-complexity PCBA testing


 programming, and functional testing to keep up with high production volumes. Massively parallel board testing can test multiple boards at the same time using multiple testing cores. Given their simpler and smaller board designs, low-complexity products can accommodate 20 boards on a single manageable-sized panel. In- circuit testers capable of massively parallel testing are with test cores to execute tests for all boards in the panel in parallel. This approach integrates  Massively parallel testing can also lead to an


increase in the density of panel testing. Parallel tests a greater number of boards simultaneously on a single panel. Consequently, there is a reduction in the requirement for additional  in cost savings and enhanced production scalability. Overall, massively parallel testing provides advantages over standard parallel testing, especially in high-volume manufacturing. This is an extract of a longer article. You can


read the full story at: www.automationmagazine.  strategies-for-testing-high-volume-low- 


Keysight Technologies www.keysight.com/gb/en/


automationmagazine.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40