search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PC-OCT22-PG21.1_Layout 1 05/10/2022 15:17 Page 21


FLOW & LEVEL CONTROL THREE STEPS TO FAST AND SIMPLE VALVE SELECTION


Kieran Bennett, Industry Manager – Food & Bev at Bürkert, explains how to specify a control valve using the company’s calculator tool


pecifying a replacement control valve can be a challenge. Making the right choice ensures optimum system control and accuracy, but sizing requires time, and a certain level of expertise. To help resolve these challenges, Bürkert has released a new tool that makes sizing and specifying a control valve for most applications a fast and simple process. When a replacement control valve is required, it’s often the case that the user isn’t aware of the full specification detail or the application’s parameters. This can make what should be a simple, like-for-like swap, a complex and onerous task for the plant engineer. Even if involving a third-party supplier, it can extend procurement time and still require the provision of a detailed specification. Otherwise, it can mean assumptions made by the supplier in specification that might not ensure optimum control valve accuracy.


S


In many cases, the extent of the end-user’s knowledge is that they require a particular size of modulating control valve. However, to ensure that it’s correctly specified, the valve supplier might ask for details that the engineer probably doesn’t have easy access to, such as flow rate or the viscosity of the media. In reality, for the vast majority of applications it’s fast and simple to specify the right control valve, based on three simple criteria, readily available to the end user. The first question is: what does the valve primarily control? The answer is a choice between flow, temperature, or pressure. Secondly, what media is the valve controlling


and what is the application type? Is a liquid, steam or gas is involved, and is the media is aggressive? Understanding the application type also confirms aspects such as the specific hygienic requirements of the design, as well as the control type required, for example, modulating or isolation. Thirdly, inlet line size should be confirmed.


Calculating valve size easily To quickly specify a complete package with part numbers, including the right control valve with process controller, sensor, and cables, Bürkert has developed a Valve Sizing Calculator, based on the three selection steps. Selecting for flow control, for example, specifying a valve with a wide range, makes it suitable for almost any purpose. In the case of a water application and a 1 inch/25 mm line, the specified device can operate effectively from a minimum flow of 900l/h up to as much as 16,070l/h. Alternatively, to ensure compatibility of specified valves for temperature control and pressure control applications, the sizing tool provides minimum and maximum ratings for these attributes, as well as the Kv value.


Sizing components on an individually tailored basis achieves the highest performance. However, for the vast majority of applications, using the Valve Sizing Calculator, will not only prove faster and easier to specify a replacement control valve, but the performance difference would be negligible


compared to tailored calculation. Taking the case of flow control, 20 years ago, control valve technology demanded that the accurate valve range was between 60 and 80% open. While these values still serve as a guide, valve accuracy has improved to the extent that individual sizing is no longer required in most cases. Bürkert’s pneumatic valves are accurate to within 0.5% across nearly the entire range of motion, and if required, electromotive valves are accurate to within 0.1%.


Providing that the pressure drop across the valve is an absolute maximum of 50% of the incoming pressure, and that the temperature and pressure do not exceed or fall below the given values, the control valves specified by the Simple Sizing Tool will fit the requirements. This approach covers nearly all applications, except for those with extreme limits and fluctuations, such as steam control in a power station. For ease of procurement across the system, the Valve Sizing Calculator also specifies control technology type, ranging from angle seat valves for standard liquid flow control, to globe control for pressure modulation. Valve seal design materials are also specified, such as EPDM for aggressive liquids. For hygienic applications, PTFE seals are provided, as well as crevice-free valve clamp ends instead of threaded variants. Control valve specification doesn’t have to be challenging. Using the basic steps provided by the Valve Sizing Calculator, it’s fast and simple to specify a control valve that provides the right fit and performance. Try the Valve Sizing Calculator here: www.burkert.co.uk/en/more- about/Valve-configuration-and-valve-si zing-of-process-valves


Bürkert Fluid Control Systems www.burkert.co.uk


OCTOBER 2022 | PROCESS & CONTROL 21


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70