PC-NOV22-PG22.1_Layout 1 14/11/2022 11:59 Page 22


PROCESS AUTOMATION


MOVE OVER SCADA...


Ian Loudon, international sales and marketing manager at Omniflex, discusses why plant engineers should replace outdated SCADA systems with operator interface terminal and human machine interface systems


process visualisation and control applications. This led to many facilities implementing SCADA systems simply because there were no available alternatives. To make matters worse, many continue using these unnecessarily costly and complex systems, even as alternatives emerge, out of force of habit. Historically, PC-based SCADA systems were


T


the go-to choice for visualising plant processes and provide control room oversight of ongoing plant operations in small and medium sized plants. While these are functional systems, capable of performing the required operations, they are unnecessarily costly, with plant managers required to pay per I/O point, pay annual subscriptions, pay ongoing Windows operating system license fees, pay ongoing maintenance contracts and pay any specialist support fees. To make matters worse, they also involved surrendering control and maintenance of the SCADA PCs to IT departments, who often do not appreciate plant operational requirements. Despite the drawbacks of SCADA, many


engineers were hesitant to move away from the systems as alternatives became available because, if nothing else, SCADA systems got the job done reliably. However, as alternative technologies, such as Operator Interface Terminal (OIT) and Human Machine Interface (HMI) systems, evolve, the case for replacing


22 NOVEMBER 2022 | PROCESS & CONTROL


raditionally, PC-based SCADA systems were the only tool in the instrumentation and control engineer’s toolbox for plant


SCADA systems becomes more compelling. While process control systems provided OITs


for HMIs dedicated to specific hardware, they were stand alone and tied to a specific PLC manufacturer. Many applications have deployed PC-based SCADA systems simply because there was no other choice. However, the advent of vendor neutral


OIT/HMI displays in a range of sizes with touch screen displays and plant hardened HMI technology, suitable for both the control room and factory floor, has added another tool to plant engineers’ toolboxes. These systems allow for distributed control to local points while bringing only key parameters back to the control room, reducing control room operator workloads. This suits applications such as water pump monitoring where control room personnel simply need to know live water levels and whether the pumps are on or off.


Another key advantage of OIT/HMI systems


is that they are more robust than traditional SCADA systems. With an OIT/HMI system, there are no hard drives that can fail, no Windows operating system to support, no networking issues and no inherent cyber security concerns, something that continues to be a growing worry for many businesses, particularly around mission critical infrastructure. This makes OIT/HMI systems well suited to applications on a nuclear site, where local engineers need to know ongoing system status at a glance so they can act accordingly and there is no advantage to having a networked PC-based SCADA system in place. Omniflex’s EasyView range of HMIs can


communicate with a variety of PLC and PAC hardware and provide engineers with a flexible system to manage plant operations. EasyView HMIs come equipped with free configuration software, require no ongoing costs and are simple to use. Plant managers using an EasyView HMI solution can save around 80 per cent of implementation costs compared to a traditional SCADA system. The touch screen HMIs range from 5” to 15”


depending on the application and space constraints and are compatible with over 300 PLCs. Alternatively, HDMI capable displays, such as large flat-screen TVs can be used.. This allows plant KPIs to be displayed front and centre at all times, keeping personnel up-to- date with ongoing operations.


Omniflex www.omniflex.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70