search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BEARINGS FEATURE SMALL SAVINGS ADD UP TO MUCH LARGER ONES


When aiming for new targets such as lower carbon emissions, it pays to work from the ground up – as components like bearings can effect performance, says Eva Otel, marketing and sustainability manager at SKF


F


ood recalls are on the rise: in the USA, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA)


reports that incidents have almost doubled since 2012; in the UK, the Food Standards Agency announces around one food recall every day. As well as harming a brand, food recalls


reduce manufacturing efficiency as staff spend time hunting down the source of contamination. This undercuts the efforts that many companies are making to improve both manufacturing efficiency and environmental performance. When aiming to reach new targets such


as lower carbon emissions, it is common to fixate on the big picture. After all, a large percentage reduction is something that everybody can visualise. However, it is often by scrutinising the underlying detail that these big changes are made. Many food and beverage plants have


environmental targets to reach but achieving them can have time and cost implications. It is also important to ensure that environmental and efficiency gains go hand in hand. There are everyday procedures, such as


cleaning and other ongoing operations, that could be vastly improved by taking a new approach. A key concept is to avoid waste, rather than dealing with any that is generated. The humble bearing has a huge effect on


overall plant performance: just consider how often a failed bearing causes the shutdown of a line. However, a bearing does not need to fail in order to cause a problem. In food production, bearing housings are just one of many crevices that can harbour bacteria and so act as a source of contamination. Washdown is probably the most


important operation within food manufacturing and ensures that production conditions are pristine. However, the harshness of the process, involving high pressure jets of hot water


and corrosive chemicals, can play havoc with bearings. Water and detergent can force their way into the housing, causing internal grease to leak out. This causes two problems: it poses a contamination risk and it undermines the performance of the bearing. Consider also the time needed to relubricate these bearings and clean up the leaked grease. This is not ideal for a factory looking to


improve its environmental performance: one sustainability manager in a food plant says it sends 570kg of grease-absorbent rags to incineration per year. All of this has an environmental implication and a cost impact. Rather than fretting over


these large figures, the problem can be fixed at source by changing the type of bearing units that are in use. Specifying a bearing unit that is resistant to the washdown process, and needs no relubrication, will save time while also reducing waste. Using hygienic design principles, SKF has


developed its Blue Range of Food Line ball bearing units. These combine smooth, inert surfaces with a self-draining geometry, superior sealing and a relubrication-free design. It ensures that microbes cannot penetrate the bearing, while lubricant cannot escape. The ‘simple’ act of changing out one


bearing unit for another can have a huge effect across the entire plant, encompassing waste, carbon emissions, manufacturing efficiency and contamination. Firstly, the sealed nature of the bearing


means that leaking grease is a thing of the past. This cuts contamination risks, while also reducing the number of grease- soaked rags to zero. Sealed bearings also require no relubrication, leaving technicians free for more important jobs in


the plant. This has a further cost benefit: the cost of grease for relubrication disappears. For example, a large food industry


For all the environmental and efficiency benefits offered by the bearing units, the most important factor to a plant manager is probably their ability to reduce the risk of contamination – and cut the chance of a product recall


conveyor system with 200 bearing units may need re-greasing 50 times per year. The cost of grease may be £40/kg, that of labour around £20/hour. Removing these costs can save more than £12,000/year, and the labour redeployed into continuous improvement activities. Longer-lasting bearing units also lower


carbon emissions, as running a bearing unit for longer is more energy efficient than making a new one and fitting it. The Blue Line bearing units also run more efficiently than conventional bearing units, while their non-contact lip seal is produced more efficiently than a typical three-seal system. These bearing units require one-third


less washing water than conventional bearings, according to tests performed by The Research Institutes of Sweden (RISE). This is in part because the smooth, inert surfaces are less likely to pick up dirt and so are easier to clean. For all the environmental and efficiency


benefits offered by the bearing units, the most important factor to a plant manager is probably their ability to reduce the risk of contamination – and cut the chance of a product recall. Controlling the growth of tiny microbes


Specifying a bearing unit that is resistant to the washdown process, and needs no relubrication, will save time while also reducing waste





will ultimately help to avoid contamination problems. In a similar way, attention to detail at component level can help deliver top-line environmental and efficiency benefits. It really is true that small savings add up to large ones.


SKF www.skf.co.uk PROCESS & CONTROL | MAY 2019 35


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52