search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TEST & MAINTENANCE TWEAKING A TOOL: TIPS FOR QUICK FIXES


The more detailed information a


toolmaker has at the outset, including original drawings, the simpler and quicker moulding tools are to fix


modern moulding tools, which rather than being a solid hardened steel tool comprises 200+ individual components assembled together. Also consider future features and the


different iterations that might potentially be needed. If these are factored into the development phase of the tool, future modifications are more straightforward. Kamil says the most common adaptation is


changing the size of holes within the tool. “Because holes are typically formed using easily replaceable core pins, it’s never that much of an issue,” he noted. Moulding tools are typically designed for


Kamil Stec, tool manager at Broanmain, explains how to extend the life of precision mould tools


Stec does daily to help extend the lifespan and maintain the quality of precision mould tools. Kamil runs through a couple of the basic rules that make these modifications more straightforward and addresses several misconceptions. The cost of creating an injection moulding


U


tool can run into thousands of pounds. One of the key considerations for product engineers has to be the operational lifespan of the tooling. Rather than investing in a full tool replacement, modification options can range from cutting a new hole, to expanding the wall thickness. The process usually begins with a drawing. However, Kamil says most proficient toolmakers can eyeball a tool and present viable modification options and costs. In the four years Kamil has worked in


pdating or repairing an injection mould tool can be complex. Yet, it is something that Broanmain’s tool manager Kamil


Broanmain’s toolroom, he proudly reports that they’ve not scrapped a single tool. “Generally speaking if something breaks within the tool, there is always a way around it. Obviously the more involved the repair is, the more it is likely to cost. Yet, it’s incomparable to a full tool build.” The main instance where a new commission might be warranted is when changing the moulding material or when making multiple changes to the tool dimension, which requires adding rather than removing metal. It’s always easier to cut more material,


rather than add material in a tool. Removal is often done in small increments. If the size of the tool cavity allows it, metal can be added. But this can be highly complex and isn’t usually advisable for high-speed moulding. Making a moulded polymer part thicker is


relatively straight forward. By making the initially geometries in the tooling thin, the thickness can be expanded by making cuts into the tool. Likewise, it’s advisable to make the outside diameter and shape of the part with the tool as small as possible. This then enables the tool to be altered instead of replacing it. Imagine carving into stone.


A well-made and regularly serviced, high-quality master tool will enjoy a long and successful service life


Once the features are etched in, they are virtually impossible to remove. Until the features of the part are fully determined, leave them out. Ribbing, raised text, texture etc. can be added once the tool is near completion. In some instances it is possible to replace the core of the tool. This is more commonplace in today’s


processing a particular plastic. That’s because each polymer has different shrinkage rates and also has different gating and venting requirements. Occasionally it’s possible to mould multiple plastics in the same mould. However, there’s always a size difference in the part. This can be troublesome if the component forms part of an assembly where pieces are slotted together with precision. Changing the material can also cause other


quality issues such as flash and burns in components. Heat transfer also needs to be considered. Using copper alloys for certain sections of the tool can help to defuse the heat a bit better. Generally, a tool can be built using 30+ different materials, tool steels and alloys. Mixing different grades and hardness of tool steels is advisable, especially when there are sliding parts and complex shut offs within the mould cavity. For corrosive or abrasive plastics, like glass


filled nylon, consider wear and tear. On top of standard hardened tool steels, Broanmain can offer different treatments and coatings, such as nitriding and hard chroming. These can further improve wear resistance. Often, drawings or 3-D prototype models


don’t factor in a draft angle. This can impact the tool design process and ultimately the mould ability of a component and how it’s ejected from the tool cavity during production. As well as increasing the number of rejected parts and potentially affecting the finish of the component, not having a draft angle can also damage the mould tool. Rather than having squared walls in the injection moulded part, they need to be slanted at an angle to the ejection and opening of the tool. An undercut is a feature that is formed


perpendicular to the mould tool standard opening direction and prevents easy demoulding. A typical example is an opening in the side of a part. Designers love them. Yet for an open and shut moulding tool, filling the perpendicular opening can be complex and costly. The more openings, the more expensive it can be, as additional tooling actions are often required.


Broanmain Plastics www.broanmainplastics.co.uk


MARCH 2021 | PROCESS & CONTROL 43


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64