Data acquisition
Remaining data compliant in highly regulated industries
The amount of data that is created globally has increased by 5,000 per cent from 2010 to 2020, according to Forbes. While we are seeing a rapid increase in data collection, particularly in industry, are we using it effectively? Here Mike John, technical director of industrial metrology specialist The Sempre Group, explains how manufacturers in highly regulated industries can automate data collection to streamline compliance reporting and gain insights into their processes.
Q 64
uality management is integral to high precision industries, such as medical and aerospace.
Manufacturers in these sectors must comply with increasingly stringent regulations and provide customers with a fully traceable report that proves quality throughout the product’s lifecycle to ensure they continually deliver safe and reliable products. Medical device manufacturers, for
example, must ensure that they are 21 CFR Part 11 compliant. This regulation ensures electronically generated information is fully traceable and there are no gaps where human error can occur in data collection and introduce untraceable faults, leading to non- compliance or retesting. There must be a trail of where data is amended, stored, transferred or accessed. Similarly, AS9100 is the international quality management systems standard for the aviation and defence industry. To comply, manufacturers must clearly demonstrate and communicate safety and reliability across the supply chain, as errors can be fatal in this industry.
THe probleM WiTH Manual Manual data collection is time consuming, is not fully traceable and significantly increases the risk of human
error, because there is no guarantee that operators input data from one source to another accurately. By reviewing incorrect data operators might recalibrate machinery unnecessarily, stop production or allow lower quality parts to pass inspection, damaging production levels and making the parts non-compliant. Monitoring quality management data
can involve isolated Excel documents that can be easily misplaced on computers, making it hard to prove compliance if parts are not up to specification. Additionally, finding historical data from parts made months or even years ago can become a laborious task that only people with access to the data files and systems can carry out. Without a digital thread connecting
to a product to report, the process can never be fully traceable. For example, a developer might take notes of measurements in a first article inspection (FAI) report and input the dimensions into an isolated Excel file that is not linked to the original ballooned drawing or future quality checks, making it difficult to guarantee that all parts meet specifications. Instead, the operator can use fully
traceable automated data collection systems, such as High QA, to streamline FAI reporting. It allows developers to automatically identify geometric dimensioning and
tolerancing (GD&T) from models, identify critical dimensions and input all the data in the ballooned drawing, populating a final report. Engineers can store the original report and future measurement data in the same centralised system, allowing them to automatically compare the ballooned drawing to end products.
Value By using automated, real-time data collection software, such as the Prolink SPC Data Collection Software, manufacturers can extract real-time data from any device to enable full analysis and reporting. Removing isolated documents allows manufacturers to easily communicate important quality information to stakeholders, reducing the time required for compliance reporting. Automated reporting and data collection allows manufacturers to get the most out of their workforce by moving them away from repetitive work and into more skilled processes that require human intervention. Analysing the reports provides
engineers with full visibility over production quality processes, allowing them to both prove and identify areas for improvement. For example, if operators notice that a few parts are not compliant, they can use the report to discover when the fault occurred and proactively resolve the issue. Over time this will decrease the
May 2022 Instrumentation Monthly
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82
