search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Façade Maintenance


The Façade Industry Is Changing. Here’s Where Towercraft Fits.


The buildings that define modern skylines share a common challenge: their façades require regular cleaning, inspection and maintenance, at height, at scale, and with increasing pressure to do it more safely, more consistently and with better records. Robotic façade care has moved from concept to operational reality. The question for every firm involved in building maintenance is not whether this shift is coming. It is whether you will be part of shaping it.


Towercraft is a robotic façade cleaning and inspection system designed to work within existing building infrastructure. It is not a replacement for the industry. It is the next layer of it.


For BMU Firms A New Role, Not a Rival


BMU systems have always been the backbone of high-rise façade access. That does not change with robotics. What changes is what the BMU carries.


Installed on existing BMU systems, monorails, spider cranes and mobile cranes, Towercraft the


transforms access infrastructure


into a robotic operation platform. The BMU still provides access. Towercraft uses that access to deliver low-pressure cleaning, digital inspection and a full operational record, without putting a person on the façade.


A BMU used only for manned access has one range of application. A BMU configured for robotic operation has a broader


one. Cleaning


cycles can increase. Façade condition can be monitored more regularly. Building management receives structured data after every operation, not just a cleaned surface. That outcome does not reduce the importance of BMU infrastructure. It extends it.


In December 2024, Alimak Group and Skyline Robotics announced


a five-year partnership to develop an


integrated robotic BMU for automated facade care. The largest players in vertical access are building robotics into their systems. BMU firms that move in the same direction will define the next maintenance standard. Those that do not will find themselves responding to one set by others.


For FM Firms A Stronger Contract, Not a Competing One


Building owners are no longer asking only whether the work is done. They are asking how it was done, at what risk level, and what data it produced. Towercraft is not a competitor to the FM contract. It is a specialist robotic operation that works inside the FM firm’s existing framework.


The FM firm retains the client relationship, opens work permits, coordinates the site and approves the


method


statement.


Towercraft delivers the façade operation. The FM firm presents the outcome to the building owner under its own contract.


The working at height risk is not theoretical. HSE provisional data for 2025/26 recorded 31 fatal falls


from height in Great


Britain, the leading cause of workplace fatality. Every from


person an active


removed façade


represents a measurable


reduction in exposure. That reduction has direct value for the FM firm’s safety record, insurance position and client documentation.


An FM firm that incorporates robotic façade care does not simply offer the same service at a lower risk level. It offers a different category of service: planned robotic cleaning, surface condition reporting, digital inspection records and structured maintenance data. The FM firms that will lead the next generation of façade contracts are those that bring new capability in on their own terms, presented as a service upgrade. Towercraft is the robotic partner that makes that possible.


Towercraft Doesn’t Compete.It Completes. 36 fmuk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52