search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
IN PARTNERSHIP


Why is diversity important in clinical trials? A lack of comprehensive data makes it difficult for regulators and physicians to understand how medical treatments and medications behave in certain populations. Different races and ethnicities often respond differently to medical products, leading to variances in pharmaco- kinetics, efficacy and safety. Differences are related to intrinsic and extrinsic factors: • Intrinsic – genetics, metabolism, elimination.


• Extrinsic – diet, environmental exposure, sociocultural issues.


To account for variances, researchers must


focus on recruiting diverse participants to achieve clinical relevance. For example, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations occur in 30% to 40% of non-small cell lung cancer in Asian populations compared with 10% to 15% in Western populations. This is significant because Asians represent 5.6% of the total US population, yet less than 2% of the Asian population is represented in clinical trials. Increasing clinical trial diversity leads to


improved medical care, better targeted treatments for minority population segments, and better overall health outcomes. Here are some best practices for improving diversity in clinical trials:


1. Use translation services Language barriers are a major obstacle for many minority participants. The US Food & Drug Administration (FDA)


recommends providing trial resources and documents in multiple languages or organising interpreters for participants with limited English comprehension. This is to increase the participation and retention of individuals with limited understanding. While some sponsors have guidance and


processes that dictate translation services only if they enrol three subjects of the same language, US Oncology Research’s affiliated IRB requires that informed consent forms will be available in other languages if a research participant does not understand English. This practice has significantly reduced research participant barriers to entry. Because US Oncology Research manages about 400 high-risk trials annually, its affiliated IRB also requires all research participants who


have provided consent in a short form to provide consent again with a fully translated version of the informed consent form (ICF) before participation in a clinical trial. Translation services can significantly reduce participant entry barriers and improve the accuracy of clinical trial data.


2. Remove barriers Under-enrolment of diverse groups in clinical trials has been a long-standing issue for researchers. Contributing factors include a shortage of suitably qualified investigators in under-represented communities and clinics, budget constraints, and a general lack of resources. Participant barriers to enrolment include


the following: • mistrust/fear • impact of social determinants of health • lack of information about clinical trials • discomfort with the clinical trial process • logistical constraints • language barriers Language barriers can delay clinical trial timelines and participant access to treatment. To avoid delays in document translation, US Oncology Research uses a single vendor to handle all elements of translation services.


3. Make reasonable accommodations Some participants require special accommodations due to disabilities and may be physically unable to participate unless their needs are addressed. Minority populations may have fewer


resources, such as childcare and transportation, interfering with participating in clinical trials. Elderly adults often have physical limitations that


“Under-enrolment of diverse groups has been a long-standing issue. Contributing factors include a shortage of suitably qualified investigators in under- represented communities and clinics, budget restraints and a lack of resources.”


Outsourcing in Clinical Trials Handbook | 75


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100