search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Supply chain & logistics Eyes on the prize


The idea of an intelligent supply chain with end-to-end visibility has been talked about for years. But how much of this potential has been realised in the supply chain of the pharmaceutical


industry, a notoriously slow mover when it comes to adopting new technologies? Peter Littlejohns asks Karen Taylor, research director of the Centre for Health Solutions, Deloitte; and Emily May, life sciences insight lead, Centre for Health Solutions, Deloitte just how intelligent pharma supply chains are currently, and what’s stopping the industry from going for full adoption.


P


hrases like ‘end-to-end visibility’ and ‘intelligent automation’ are often met with nods and applause at pharmaceutical industry conferences. In the holy grail scenarios presented by speakers, visibility along each link of the supply chain is guaranteed, with data collected from the manufacturing floor to the moment a product leaves the delivery vehicle. The value of this level of supply chain visibility is easy to imagine; with eyes on every link in the chain, a company can better manage their inventory, forecast demand for products and minimise the risk of temperature


excursions – just to name a few benefits. But back in the real world, the suite of technology necessary to make that possible – sensors, devices, AI, data processing and a user interface – carry a cost, and that’s why the apparent support for these advances isn’t reflected in the level of investment necessary to achieve them. “There’s a nervousness about being a first mover in this space, spending lots of money and it not working,” says Karen Taylor, research director of the Centre for Health Solutions, Deloitte. “Pharma companies tend to be more conservative. Each


28


World Pharmaceutical Frontiers / www.worldpharmaceuticals.net


Red Vector; TarikVision/www.shutterstock.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49