022 REPORTER
Right After a busy year at the Institute of Making, Laughlin was keen to take the summer break to ‘walk, draw, make’ and visit friends and family
harder to make a proper spoon than it is to cut it out – it’s not eficient – but what you bring to [the experiment] is so much more, because you’re bringing all the cultural associations.’ Such an experiment will still provide scientific outcomes, she reiterates, but what’s more, Laughlin adds, is that ‘later, when that research is over, because it’s a spoon, it can explode into the world in a different way [...] it can explode into the world with a whole layer of meaning and resonance that normal experimental apparatus doesn’t have. So in making the object, you’re making experimental objects and apparatus and equipment, but also, a sculpture; also, a utensil; also an everyday object that people know the name of.’
A set of the spoons are now in the materials library at the heart of the IoM, among an estimated 3,000 other objects. There are two kinds of objects within it, Laughlin explains. The first is ‘things that are out there in the world’, which, in the context of the library, ‘speak to each other differently because they are next to each other’. The other kind, which is less common in the materials library world, is ‘making new things, that don’t [yet] exist in the world, that tell you something about the world, that tell you something about materials, that tell you something about making itself, and materials in themselves, through this thing that you can now hold in your hand’.
Laughlin describes the materials library as
offering a lens on the world, and that building it would continue to be ‘a life’s work’. There is currently no sign of it stopping, and the IoM will soon be expanding to a second location, ‘ten times’ as big, in UCL’s new East Marshgate Campus by the Olympic Park. The IoM will have its own building within the Stanton Williams- designed building, which Laughlin hopes will be a ‘cathedral to materials’ – an appropriate veneration, given her raison d’etre, perhaps! There, the IoM will be able to explore areas such as food – a ‘great starting point’ for materials engagement, Laughlin explains, and one that she is already well-known for, through her BBC Radio 4 show, The Kitchen Cabinet. As Laughlin illuminates the endless possibilities of materials, deciding what to work on seems an impossible choice. She explains that some of her own or the IoM’s projects might stem from an idea that pops into her head (that glass cymbal, for example), kept on the back burner until a suitable collaboration comes along; others might start with art (drawn studies of rocks, becoming imaginary rocks, becoming an investigation into how to fake materials); others might be linked to funding. Some projects, meanwhile, have pressing issues behind them: inevitably, waste has been on Laughlin’s mind for some time, as an unavoidable by-product of all the ‘stuff’ sent out into the world. ‘It’s really incredibly humbling when you spend your entire life celebrating this stuff, to then realise that it is also a huge problem and there it is in the bin’, she explains. In response, Laughlin created the documentaries The Secret Life of Landfill: A Rubbish History (2018), and The Secret Science of Sewage’ (2021), while the IoM have current research projects looking at composting, plastic
waste and repair, including a repair workshop coinciding with COP26. How you speak about important matters
makes a difference, and this is a key part of what Laughlin does so well – in person, on tv and radio, and online. She describes the team’s approach as one of ‘delight and curiosity’, which seems to manifest as an irresistible energy bound to engage an audience. But at the same time, Laughlin explains, the topics are explored thoroughly and responsibly, bringing experts such as economists and life-cycle analysts. Part of her simply enjoys the pure
performance of her broadcast appearances, but more crucially, Laughlin explains, ‘if you don’t hear someone talking about these things in the public domain, how do you even know that it sort of exists, right?’ She thinks materials need the same kind of representation as medicine gets: ‘We all have a body, and there’s lots of things about the body that people need to be educated about, informed about, are going to be empowered about, by understanding their health, their happiness, their psychology… [But] we also all have things, right?! [...] And those things don’t just miraculously appear in your life; they have histories, they have stories, they have politics, they have economics, they have ecological angles; you can take that one object and unpack it from many different directions.’ Laughlin’s rapid, excitable conversation and
prolific output suggests she moves a mile a minute at all times, but when talking about what she’ll do over her summer break – the IoM
follows the academic year – she describes a familial link to a different kind of time. Both sides of her family are of farming stock, from a world run by different rhythms and notions of production. She recalls conversations with her grandfather, where he would say to her, ‘when you’re 50, Zoe, you need to cut this tree down.’ It’s a percipience sorely lacking in the current age of immediacy, so Laughlin has started asking young engineers and designers in recent years: ‘What would it be like to not call yourself a designer, but to call yourself a materials farmer? Because you need to think of the whole process of it, and the whole life of it, and you need to maintain the soil to be suitable for that activity in years to come. You can’t just burn through all this stuff and make these things without knowing where the stuff comes from.’ As I leave Laughlin to finish up her year,
surrounded by an array of different objects, it’s clear that what she and the IoM does is a world away from the heavily marketed ‘maker spaces’ and ‘innovation labs.’ Hers is a more organic, creative process. Over her time off, she’ll visit friends and family, and ‘walk, draw, make. Repair some trousers that I’ve been meaning to stitch back up. Just [...] do stuff, which will always feed back into the day job.’ She also mentions a few extra projects on the horizon – including a materials workshop with experimental performance group Figs in Wigs (included in FX May/June 2021) and a secret project involving potatoes. I’m not sure what to make of that, but I look forward to finding out.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133
