| 13
ONE-SIZE EUDR DOESN’T FIT
The EUDR is back on for 2025 implementation, but Timber Development UK chief executive David Hopkins says it needs further adaptation to the commodity supply chains it covers
The ongoing saga around the introduction of the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) has been a salutary lesson in how NOT to make policy.
The basic principles of the EUDR – to regulate trade in forest risk commodities to curb deforestation and encourage better governance at source – were welcomed by everyone. Everyone knows agricultural expansion is the biggest cause of deforestation globally, so targeting key agricultural forest risk commodities is a good, well accepted idea. However, the policy makers did not marry up regulatory development with the way each of these commodity markets actually operates. There seemed to be little consultation with industries involved, little attempt to understand the complexity of their supply chains, before then trying to shoe-horn all of them into a one- size-fits-all data gathering and due diligence model. Needless to say, there has been backlash, back pedalling and delays since it was first announced. From a great idea with cross-society consensus, there are now recriminations, delays and disagreements within supply chains worldwide.
As the problems with the EUDR became apparent, and perhaps not wanting to upset the food and farming sectors in an election year, the European Commission (EC) first pushed back the EUDR 12 months from its original introduction date of December 2024. In the interim, major nations including the US, China, Brazil and Indonesia have claimed the regulation is an unfair barrier to trade. The country deforestation risk benchmarking system also seemed to satisfy nobody, with only a small number of countries being classified high risk, and the rest standard or low.
From here, even European sawmillers – albeit with
exceptions among the larger groups who had done the requisite preparation – took a stance against the measures. Many felt the extra due diligence measures, particularly gathering GPS data on provenance was too much for smaller companies.
Then in September the EC first announced the EUDR would be delayed another 12 months, due to unpreparedness of the regulation’s IT system. Now they’ve said that it will be introduced in December 2025 but for larger companies only and with a six-month grace period.
All this confusion does nobody any favours. The Commission effectively smashed the pro EUDR consensus and now faces opposition from industry and NGOs alike. The delay and dithering also causes a lack of confidence in the forest sector. Any prospective investor will want to know there is a stable regulatory environment, so this inability to get things working has a negative effect on forests themselves.
It’s a real shame because there was a lot of industry and NGO goodwill behind the idea of the regulation. But there seems to have been little thought about the practical implications and very little political goodwill to achieve it. I don’t know where this will end up now, but it may require a rethink focusing on the original aims and objectives but with a greater understanding of how supply chains and markets currently operate. I hope we get a meaningful outcome soon! ■
The delay and dithering also causes a lack of confidence in the forest sector
www.ttjonline.com | November/December 2025 | TTJ
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77
