Powering Australia |
How EVs can support the grid during a blackout: a real world example
During a major storm event that eventually cut power to tens of thousands of homes, a fleet of electric vehicles (EVs) were able to feed power back into Australia’s electricity grid, according to a new report* from The Australian National University (ANU)
The lead author of the study, Senior Research Fellow Dr Bjorn Sturmberg, says it’s the first time in the world this type of vehicle-to-grid response to an emergency has been demonstrated. “It shows electric vehicles can provide the backup we need in an emergency like this,” he said. “We have a fleet of 51 [Nissan LEAF] EVs across Canberra that monitor the grid whenever they’re plugged in and can quickly inject short bursts of power to rebalance the system if the national grid rapidly loses power. They’re essentially big batteries on wheels.” “The event in February — caused by storms in Victoria — was the first real-world test of our vehicles and chargers. We now know a vehicle-to- grid system can work.”
(a)
50.1 50.0 49.9 49.8 49.7
The fleet of 51 EVs is deployed as part of the Realising Electric Vehicle- to-Grid Services (REVS) project, together with 51 bidirectional chargers and charge control systems designed to provide frequency support services. REVS participants include: Australian Renewable Energy Agency (funder); ANU; ACT government (fleet owner); SG Fleet Australia (fleet operator); JET Charge; Nissan Motor Co.; ActewAGL Distribution; and Evoenergy.
At the time of the 13 February 2024 weather event, which caused 90 000 electricity consumers in Melbourne to lose electricity supply, 16 EVs were plugged in at six properties across Canberra (about 500 km from the location of the downed transmission lines that caused the contingency). Four were charging, while 12 were idle. Within seconds all the vehicles started discharging power into the grid, “as they’ve been programmed to do,” Dr Sturmberg said. “In total, they provided 107 kilowatts of support to the national grid. To put that in perspective, 105 000 vehicles responding in this way would fully cover the backup required for the whole of the ACT and NSW.
Moment response triggered Trigger frequency (49.85Hz)
“For context, there were just under 100 000 EVs sold in Australia last year.”
Dr Sturmberg said there is still work to be done to balance the growing demand for vehicle charging with grid security.
“With the number of EVs on our roads growing fast, the grid won’t be able to cope with everyone
13 February 2024 storm event. Source REVS.
charging at the same time when they get home in the evening,” he said.
“Additionally, in the case of the February emergency, once the vehicles had provided power for ten minutes some resumed charging by default. There would be little cost or inconvenience in delaying charging for an hour or two in this kind of situation. “It may call for an industry adjustment, for instance, to require EV manufacturers to program their vehicles to stop charging during a grid emergency, with an option for drivers to override for urgent charging.
13:10 13:12 13:14 Time on 13/2/2024
(a) Frequency of the Australian power system as recorded by high-speed power meters at six properties in Canberra for the ten-minute period from 13:09 (trace shown is their average)
(b)
800 750 700 650
13:10 Average power before event
6 seconds after event triggered 60 seconds after event triggered
13:16 13:18 13:12 13:14 Time on 13/2/2024
(b) Total power imported across the six properties. The contingency underfrequency trigger of 49.85 Hz was crossed at 13:09:43, at which point the power imports of the properties quickly began to decline from an average of 799.9 kW in the minute before the event to 699.0 kW at 13:09:57 and 662.9 kW 13:11:18. Such a decrease in power demand is precisely what is needed to correct the power supply-demand imbalance evidenced by an underfrequency
13:16 13:18
“Stopping just 6000 EVs charging would have kept the power on for those 90 000 customers whose power was cut on 13 February. The February event also illustrated how well-managed unidirectional (ie, non V2G) EV charging can make a substantial contribution to power system security. There were 23 non-V2G- enabled EVs plugged in at the six properties during the February event, which were charging at an average of 30.8 kW. Stopping this charging, together with the charging of the four V2G EVs that were charging at the outset of the contingency, would have created a contribution of 57.9 kW to power system frequency restoration without the use of V2G. “Our results show that
EV charging and discharging power as recorded by the bidirectional chargers. (total power for 16 chargers combined). Source REVS. The EVs discharge and then go back to charging
Imports
50 25 0
-25 -50 -75
13:10 Response triggered Imports Exports 13:15 13:20 Time on 13/2/2024 13:25
*Bjorn C. P. Sturmberg, Kathryn Lucas-Healey, Laura Jones et al. Vehicle-to-grid response to a frequency contingency in a national grid – successes and shortcomings, 4 June 2024, preprint (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi. org/10.21203/
rs.3.rs-4445838/v1]
14 | July/August 2024|
www.modernpowersystems.com
vehicle-to-grid can be a powerful contributor to our power system’s security, and that all electric vehicles have an important role to play,” concludes Dr Sturmberg.
Total power (kW)
Total property power (kW)
Frequency
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61
