search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Transmission & distribution |


Flywheel safety and the future power system


An ABB perspective Christian Payerl Area Sales Manager, Synchronous Condensers, Europe and Australia, ABB


The need to decarbonise power production and increase the use of renewable energy has led to rapid changes in the way power is generated. Almost without exception renewable power sources are “non-synchronous”, with inverters connecting to the power grid. These inverters have no inherent kinetic reserve. At the same time, large fossil fuelled power plants are being decommissioned, and with that the total spinning mass or kinetic reserve in the power system is reduced.


The rationale for developing flywheels for use in synchronous condensers derives from these major changes occurring in the power system. More renewables lead to less inertia, less fault current contribution and the risk of more power oscillations and less damping. It is therefore no surprise that the wish to increase the kinetic energy of synchronous condensers with the addition of flywheels is creating a drive for bigger and bigger flywheels to become available on the market. For ABB this is not just about increasing flywheel inertia. Security and reliability come first, and with that, an increased focus on safety and failure mode effect analysis as well as tougher requirements for auxiliary systems and for the balance of plant equipment.


We want to make sure that our plants fulfill safety requirements not only today, but also after ten years of operation. The losses associated with our flywheel solution are a bit greater than those experienced with vacuum chamber flywheels, but, for ABB, safety is paramount and therefore our preferred technology is synchronous condensers with flywheels located in integrated safety enclosures. ABB´s whitepaper Ensuring the safety of large flywheels used to stabilize electrical networks* aims to make users of synchronous condensers with


Flywheel design for synchronous condenser applications embodying safety principles set out in the ABB white paper (source: ABB)


Flywheel unit


Protection cage (integrated)


Flywheel


flywheels aware of the lack of specific standards covering these machines.


The consequence is that safety measures need to be handled by the supplying manufacturer and the owner of the plant. Unfortunately, only ISO norm ISO12100:2010 is applicable to the safety of this type of machinery, setting out general principles for design, risk assessment and risk reduction. For the US market a Recommended practice for the design and operation of flywheels has been written by Sandia National Laboratories (SAND2015-10759).


Synchronous condenser (right), with flywheel (middle) and pony motor (left) (source: ABB)


The ABB white paper describes the basic principles of flywheel risk assessment. Even though the probability of a crack in the rotor or the flywheel is very limited, the severity and consequences of such a failure can be significant. The white paper describes the principles of safe design as well as recommended practices and how they are to be implemented. It


concludes with a description of a proposed design for a flywheel for synchronous condenser applications.


The recommendations summarised in the white paper provide the basis for the flywheel design used in ABB’s ongoing supply and delivery of flywheel-equipped synchronous condensers. ABB’s recent synchronous-condenser-with- flywheel experience includes the following projects:


Lister Drive 1, 67 MVA, 470 MW.s (UK); Lister Drive 2, 67 MVA, 470 MW.s (UK); Santa Ponsa 1, 55 MVA, 468 MW.s (Spain); Santa Ponsa 2, 55 MVA, 468 MW.s (Spain); Jares, 28 MVA, 468 MW.s (Spain); Arucas, 28 MVA, 468 MW.s (Spain); Drago, 28 MVA, 468 MW.s (Spain); Darwin, 40 MVA, 465 MW.s (Australia); and Jeju Island, 50 MVA, 497 MW.s (60Hz) (South Korea).


* https://search.abb.com/library/Download.aspx?DocumentID=9AKK108468A1997&LanguageCode=en&DocumentPartId=&Action=Launch 30 | March 2025| www.modernpowersystems.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47