search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
| Regulations & policies


of resources, by utilising international water law’s principle of reasonable and equitable utilisation. This principle was employed to develop the concept of a “water window special operation,” aimed at addressing varying water uses in the basin and the principle was invoked as a customary rule of international water, even though the principle is not contained in any pertinent agreement between the parties.


Chinese investment China is located upstream on most of the major


transboundary waters shared with vast populations across Asia. Heavily invested in developing hydropower at home and abroad, it often involves freshwater crossing national borders and raises complex issues in international law. It’s also a situation that is exacerbated by growing economic, environmental, and regional security pressures. An article by Wouters et al published in Frontiers in


Climate examines the regulatory interface of relevant legal frameworks, with a focus on China’s approach to such transboundary developments. While international economic – and more specifically international investment law – is not directly concerned with international water law, host states and foreign investors must be informed, and take into account, the legal obligations governing transboundary waters. According to the authors, China’s position as a major water user (at home) and significant investor (abroad) on transboundary waters, makes it a unique case study for exploring the rules of international law, In examining the interface of international water


law and international investment law, in the context of hydropower development on transboundary watercourses by China at home and abroad, Wouters et al made the following observations: All transboundary waters are governed by the rules of international water law, comprised of norms of customary and treaty law. China appears to follow the major tenets of international water law (the duties of equitable and reasonable use; due diligence obligation to prevent causing significant harm; procedural rules, institutional mechanisms, dispute prevention), with nuanced approaches to applying these rules in different watercourses. China is major player in the development of hydropower infrastructure in Africa, both as a lender to African governments and as a developer of dams and electricity, in its capacity as foreign investor. The rules of international investment law and the investment agreements concluded between China and African countries will certainly provide protection to Chinese investors and projects. While international investment law is not concerned directly with the legal regime governing transboundary waters, its rules are designed to deter governments from significant and unpredictable legislative changes, including regulatory adaptability to tackle extreme hydrological variability. This could affect the terms of the hydropower infrastructure agreement between the developer and the host state, which, in turn, could affect the host state’s international duties on its transboundary waters. The rule of due diligence applies in each regulatory domain and could be considered as one of the key legal elements in this field pertaining to both. These combined due diligence obligations


converge to require adopting and implementing best practice in the construction and maintenance of hydropower projects on transboundary waters, including a balancing of competing interests, implemented through procedural norms, such as environmental impact assessment, exchange of information and technical cooperation. Foreign investors are required to observe a higher duty of care, through due diligence, principles of corporate social responsibility, and other soft law conventions applicable to the activities of corporations abroad.


The authors conclude that while international economic law is not directly concerned with international water law, host states and foreign investors must be informed regarding, and should take into account, the applicable legal obligations governing transboundary waters. Clarity on the rules of international law provides the necessary support for the peaceful management of shared resources. Understanding the interface between the two regulatory regimes contributes to a more holistic approach in this complex field.


Small hydro guidelines In the US, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)


has recently prepared the Small Hydropower Interconnection Best Practices Guidelines to provide small hydropower developers with the knowledge and tools for navigating the interconnection process from licensing through to interconnection. Acknowledging that the process for developing a


hydropower project can be a convoluted and lengthy process, ORNL says it often involves numerous agencies and encompasses a plethora of stakeholders that other renewable project development processes may not have to consider. The primary objectives of these small hydro guidelines


are to provide small hydropower developers with: A clear understanding of the processes, procedures, studies, and stakeholders necessary to develop a small hydropower project from concept through to interconnection. Specific tools, templates, and methodologies for each phase of the project, including licensing, stakeholder engagement, and interconnection with the utility. Links and references to specific additional resources available to assist throughout the process. Although the interconnection process contains a great deal of uncertainty, small hydroelectric developers can minimise their investment in time and money in reaching an agreement by being prepared and forearmed with knowledge of the process, ORNL says. Good practices include engaging with the


Interconnection Authority and other stakeholder groups on a regular basis early on, and building partnership relationships with them whenever possible. Although different interconnection authorities have different processes and requirements, ORNL says that project developers who are familiar with the small generator interconnection process will have reasonable expectations of the process and timelines involved. Furthermore, investing in communications with the IA early in the process is likely to result in fewer iterations and requests for additional information later in the process when designs are more complete and changes more costly.


Above: Neelum-Jhelum hydropower project in Pakistan


References


Efficiency and Effectiveness of Implementation of Hydropower Development Policy in Nepal by Dr. Bijay Lal Pradhan, Dhun Bahadur Budhathoki, and Dr. Rajeshwori Malla-Pradhan. Journal of Shaheed Smarak College, Vol .1, No.1, 2023.


Butt AQ, Shangguan D, Ding Y, Banerjee A, Sajjad W and Mukhtar MA (2024), Assessing the existing guidelines of environmental impact assessment and mitigation measures for future hydropower projects in Pakistan. Front. Environ. Sci. 11:1342953. doi: 10.3389/ fenvs.2023.1342953


Edum C, Rieu-Clarke A, McIntyre O and Tignino M (2024) Editorial: Doubling global hydropower capacity by 2050 – what about the transboundary dimension? Front. Clim. 6:1441782. doi: 10.3389/ fclim.2024.1441782


Wouters P, Daza-Clark AM and Devlaeminck DJ (2024) China’s transboundary hydropower development at home and abroad: exploring the regulatory interface between international water law and international economic law. Front. Clim. 5:1302103. doi: 10.3389/fclim.2023.1302103


Small Hydropower Interconnection Best Practices Guidelines and Templates by Christopher J. O’Reilley, Hope J. Corsair. February 2024. Prepared by Oak Ridge National Laboratory, managed by UT-Battelle LLC for the US Department Of Energy under contract DE-AC05- 00OR2272


www.waterpowermagazine.com | November 2024 | 33


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45