search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Risk management |


Safety first for zero failures


Mining continues to play an important role in many communities around the globe, but any failure has the potential to cause catastrophic and long-lasting impacts to water quality, aquatic life and human health. To start on the path to zero failures, tailings facility inventories need to be reduced with the adoption of best available practices and technologies. Suzanne Pritchard reports on recent developments in the Canadian province of British Columbia where there is growing pressure to address the risks posed by tailings dams in the face of climate change


Right: Mineral tailings mud after dam rupture in Córrego do Feijão, Brazil in 2019. The tailings dam at the mining facility were built using the upstream construction method. Upstream dams are known to have higher rates of stability issues and are susceptible to failure by liquefaction


“THE SAFEST TAILINGS DAM is the one that is not built. And if built, without perpetual oversight, the failure of a tailings dam is inevitable.” These stark remarks were made in the recent publication of Safety First: Guidelines for Responsible Mine Tailings Management which was written by Earthworks, MiningWatch Canada and the London Mining Network, amongst others. The report goes on to add that at present, industry


standards and governmental regulations “do not go far enough” to adequately protect communities and ecosystems from tailings failures. Indeed, the design, construction, operation and closure of tailings facilities still require significant changes to protect people and the environment.


“Operating companies must commit to making safety the primary consideration in tailings facilities and dam design, construction, operation, closure and post- closure,” the authors state, adding that “the primacy of safety must be independently verified” and that a culture of safety and responsibility “must be upheld at


34 | November 2022 | www.waterpowermagazine.com


the highest level within a corporation”. To understand how and why failures occur, the authors of this report stress that “we must understand the scope of the issue”. “A global inventory of the thousands of active and abandoned tailings disposal facilities does not exist, nor is there a complete registry of tailings dam failures,” according to the report. “Compiling and sharing this information, publicly and transparently, is essential. An independent international agency, such as a United Nations endorsed agency, in collaboration with civil society, states, and operating companies, must drive the process to collect information on tailings dams and tailings dam failures worldwide, and share it with the public to reduce the risks associated with these sites and promote the protection of human health and the environment.”


Driving risk


Independent assessment and transparency have been called for in relation to tailings management


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53