| Geotechnical investigations
kind of disaster can render them unfeasible in this region.
Ethiopia Complex geological and structural conditions are
posing challenges for the ongoing construction of the Gololcha dam on the Kurkura River, in Eastern Ethiopia. Located in the Main Ethiopian Rift volcanic terrain, this 48m high rock and earthfill dam will irrigate approximately 950 hectares of land upon completion. However, issues of leakage and slope instability are reportedly a cause for concern, according to research published in Scientific African. In the late 1970s, Ethiopia began constructing
micro dams to address drought relief and enhance food security, but the country’s history of such dam construction is said to have been coupled with significant geotechnical issues. As Merdassa et al claim, over half of Ethiopian dams have encountered issues such as leakage, reservoir siltation, spillway damage, and dam body deterioration due to insufficient initial geological, hydrological, and geotechnical investigations. High leakage rates contribute to over 60% of hydraulic structure failures in Northern Ethiopia’s Tigray region, with several micro dams constructed in central, southern, and western parts of the country also at risk of failure due to a lack of comprehensive geological understanding, insufficient subsurface investigation, and inadequate implementations of ground improvement techniques. To address abutment slope stability and leakage at the Gololcha dam, Merdassa et al employed kinematic analysis and the Limit Equilibrium Method (LEM) to assess slope stability. Additionally, engineering geological mapping, discontinuity surveys, seismic refraction tomography (SRT), and in-situ permeability testing were used to evaluate the leakage condition of the dam site.
Notably, the permeability and SRT survey results identified potential leakage zones to the depth of 35m, 30m, and 35m at the left, right, and central foundations of the dam, respectively. The kinematic method revealed one planar and two wedge modes of failure in the slope section covered by slightly weathered and fractured basalt rock at the right abutment. Further stability analysis of these two modes of failures via LEM analysis indicated slope instability under saturated conditions, emphasising the role of pore water pressure. Based on the study findings, this study recommended curtain grouting to address potential leakage, as well as slope flattening and removing unstable rock wedges and loose material to stabilise unstable slope sections.
Iranian dam Built in 1992 the Jiroft Dam in Iran’s Kerman province
is crucial for water management, flood control, and agricultural development in the region. However, the surrounding mountainous terrain, marked by fractured and weathered rock formations, presents considerable geotechnical challenges with landslides posing significant risks to the stability and safety of infrastructure projects. Research by Soltaninejad et al was based on
comprehensive field surveys and mapping, which revealed significant ground displacements and evidence of slope instabilities in the area. The
investigation identified key factors, including soil composition, rock formations, groundwater flow, and seismic activity, that contribute to these shifts in the terrain. To ensure the accuracy of the elevation data, the study employed Monte Carlo simulation techniques to analyse the statistical distribution of the collected survey data. Additionally, the Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) was utilised to evaluate the effectiveness of the current monitoring equipment and infrastructure, providing a clearer understanding of operational efficiency and areas for improvement. The observed land displacement and the
growing instability around the Jiroft Dam pose a serious and imminent threat to the integrity of this crucial infrastructure, the authors claim. Vertical displacements, some exceeding 45cm, indicate not only minor disruptions but also the potential for significant structural failure if not addressed. Such a disaster could result in irreparable damage to the dam, catastrophic flooding, and the loss of invaluable water resources – consequences that would be felt far beyond the immediate area. The need for action is not only urgent but critical, Soltaninejad et al say. Failure to act now could lead to an irreversible disaster and to prevent this an essential combination of advanced technological solutions, innovative engineering, and proactive vigilance needs to be employed.
Equally important is the establishment of a continuous, real-time monitoring system that integrates cutting-edge remote sensing, GPS, and geophysical sensors, with ongoing geotechnical investigations helping to deepen understanding of the underlying causes of the instability. In terms of stabilisation methods, considering the
severe fragmentation and significant displacement observed, Soltaninejad et al say efforts should focus on more cohesive and robust engineering solutions. Approaches such as dry-stone walls, precast concrete walls, and combined mesh systems with shotcrete are recommended, as they are better suited to address the extensive ground movement and shifting soil and rock formations in the region. These methods provide a stable and adaptive foundation, reducing the risk of further degradation and displacement.
Above: Glacial lake outburst flood
References
A massive landslide damaged NHPC’s Teesta V hydropower station on 20th August 2024 at Balutar, Sikkim Himalayas by Biswajit Bera. Natural Hazards Research 5 (2025) 372–379.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j. nhres.2024.12.005
Engineering geological investigation of Gololcha dam for evaluation of leakage and abutment slope stability, Eastern Ethiopia. Sishaw Merdassa, Tola Garo, Yadeta C. Chemeda, Shankar Karuppannan, Mahlet Tesfaye. Scientific African 26
(2024) e02381 https://doi. org/10.1016/
j.sciaf.2024. e02381
Advanced Hazard Prediction and Geotechnical Risk Management in the Jiroft Dam Project, Iran by Soltaninejad, S; Abdollahi, M.S; Naveen, BP; Marandi,S.M; Abdollahi, M.; Abdollahi, S. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1465.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ su17041465
www.waterpowermagazine.com | October 2025 | 35
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45
