search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Fish passage |


Right: The Colville Indian Reservation in Washington State is one of eight Tribal Nations most immediately affected by dams in the Columbia River Basin


Below: California Governor Gavin Newsom has launched the state’s first strategy to restore and protect populations of salmon for generations to come © Sheila Fitzgerald / Shutterstock.com


In their work they propose an analytical tool that includes a framework of fish migration, life cycle models, an impact coefficient, and a simplified population model. After clarifying migration patterns and life cycles, they show that “the Yangtze dams have severely disrupted the life cycle integrity of these species, causing seven types of invalid stocks and their exponential population declines”. Describing it as a complex issue, Zhenli Huang and Haiying Li say that “China needs to recognise scientific misjudgements to redirect research towards innovation”. They add that it’s also critical for China to learn from four decades of FRPs and focus on reforming its dam-related FRP. The authors also recommend strengthening the oversight of dam owners to clarify their obligations to protect fish. Th add that international cooperation is


urgently needed for China to enhance fish passage and ecological operation technique, helping to address these challenges and share experience in maintaining the balance between fish conservation and dam management.


References


https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2024/01/Salmon-Strategy-for-a-Hotter- Drier-Future.pdf


https://www.doi.gov/media/document/tribal- circumstances-analysis


Dams trigger exponential population declines of migratory fish Zhenli Huang and Haiying L. Huang and Li, Sci. Adv. 10, eadi6580 (2024) 10 May 2024. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adi6580


Fishheart pilot project in the US exceeded all expectations


Under the supervision of Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), a test was designed to evaluate the ability of the Fishheart fishway to provide upstream passage for fish especially for migrating American Shad and Herring at an operating hydropower project. The project was hosted by Santee Cooper at the Santee Dam and Spillway site in Pineville, South Carolina. The test had a budget of US$1.3 million


and was funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE). Testing and evaluation were carried out by Fishheart personnel together with Alden Research Laboratory and DOE’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). The test ran for 21 days. Results exceeded expectations, with


a total number of 4 144 fish, including 16 species from surface to bottom. The following table outlines the species and length ranges of fish that passed safely through the Fishheart fishway.


Species


American Eel American shad


Scientific Name


Anguilla rostrata Alosa sapidissima


Blueback Herring Bluegill Blowfin


Ictalurus furcatus Alosa aestivalis


Number collected


3 291


Black Crapple Pomoxia nigromaculatus 360 Blue Catfish


Lepomis macrochirus Amia calva


1159 673 22 3


Gizzard Shad Dorosoma cepeniadum 1210 Longnose Gar Lepisosteus osseus Redear Sunfush Lepomis microlophus Striped bass Striped mullet


Morone saxatilis Mugil cephalus


Threadfin Shad Dorosoma petenense White Catfish White crapple


Ameiurus catus Pomoxis annularis White perch Morone americana 28 | September 2024 | www.waterpowermagazine.com


67 67 19 4


238 1 6


21


Min length (mm)


-


315 272 510 215 112 648 285 590 219 415 305 85


262 290 123


Max


Length (mm)


-


488 380


1130 269 225 650 421


1145 365 870 483 157 262 428 320


Average length (mm)


-


398 323 634 244 158 649 345 826 275 582 403 118 -


339 226


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53