| Lessons learned
These comments, which are related to seismic hazard and seismic safety, apply equally to the other hazards including those due to climate change. Because of changes in hazards, design and safety criteria, and in the risk classification of dams, periodic dam safety reviews are mandatory. If important changes have taken place, a safety re-evaluation may be necessary. In the case of earthquake safety, this may be needed every 20 to 40 years. Among the natural hazards, the seismic hazard and seismic safety criteria have undergone the greatest changes over the last few decades. Safety evaluations are primarily the responsibility of the dam owners.
Steps for re-evaluation The basic steps for re-evaluating the seismic safety of
embankment dams are as follows: ● Determination of the seismic failure modes of the dam due to different types of seismic hazard.
● Ground shaking hazard: Determination of the main parameters of the safety evaluation earthquake ground motion (i.e. acceleration response spectra, peak ground acceleration (PGA), duration of strong ground shaking).
● Estimate of dynamic material properties based on static and dynamic laboratory tests or information taken from the literature.
● Dimensional finite element model of the dam- foundation system using, e.g., the equivalent linear method.
● Assessment of pore pressure build-up (liquefaction analysis for certain foundation conditions or materials in hydraulic fill dams).
● Calculation of permanent displacements of potential sliding masses along the dam slopes by, e.g., the Newmark sliding block analysis.
● Seismic settlement analysis (rough estimates can be made using empirical relations).
● Estimation of the freeboard reduction during the safety evaluation earthquake.
● Assessment of internal erosion hazard due to damage to the fine sand filter or to the water- proofing membranes etc.
● Seismic safety assessment based on the results of the earthquake analysis. For concrete dams, the basic steps are given below: ● Determination of the seismic failure modes of the dam due to different types of seismic hazard (see subsequent Section).
● Ground shaking hazard: Determination of the main parameters of the safety evaluation earthquake ground motion, which are the basis for dynamic analyse.
● Estimate of dynamic material properties of mass concrete and foundation rock.
● Modelling of joints whenever necessary. ● Dynamic analysis of a two-dimensional or three- dimensional finite element model of the dam- reservoir-foundation system.
● Dynamic stability analysis of concrete blocks separated by joints and/or cracks.
● Dynamic stability analysis of dam abutments. ● Seismic safety assessment based on the results of the earthquake analysis.
These dam analysis steps are applicable to the ground shaking hazard. For other earthquake hazards such as mass movements, fault movements, ground
displacements, liquefaction, etc., other methods may have to be followed. In general, a screening would be needed in order to identify the dams with the largest seismic risk that have to be checked first.
Seismic re-evaluations The ICOLD Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam
Design has encouraged member countries to carry out seismic safety evaluations of their existing dams. Usually, dam owners and operators are reluctant to perform seismic safety checks unless there are laws and regulations, and a dam safety organisation with the authority and means to ensure that the rules are followed. A thorough assessment of the design criteria is usually done when the dam owners are applying for a new concession for their project or are selling a dam. Again, the perception that a dam that was considered safe at the time of construction will remain safe forever, is a dangerous misconception. For example, if proper seismic re-evaluations would be carried out the dams that are vulnerable to static liquefaction could be identified and actions taken. The main conclusions are as follows:
● The dynamic analysis methods and the technology for designing and building dams that can safely resist the effects of strong ground shaking are available.
● Dams are not inherently safe against earthquakes. ● As most dams built prior to 1989 when ICOLD published its seismic design criteria of dams, were designed to resist earthquakes using analysis methods, and design and safety criteria, which are outdated and no longer compatible with the latest ones published by ICOLD in 2016, the safety of these dams is unknown and it must be assumed that several do not satisfy today’s seismic safety criteria. Therefore, dam owners especially those of older dams must start with seismic safety checks of their dams.
● Seismic safety evaluations have to be carried out periodically during the long life-span of large dams, e.g. every 20 to 40 years.
● New information on the seismic hazard and new developments in the seismic design and safety concepts of large dams may require a re- assessment of the seismic safety of dams.
● Seismic safety evaluations include the dam body, gated spillways, low-level outlets, abutment wedges and reservoir slopes where mass movements could either block intakes of the spillway or low-level outlets or create impulse waves in the reservoir that could overtop the dam. ●
Above: Today’s seismic safety criteria not only apply to the dam body but also to safety- critical elements like gated spillways and low level outlets
Author Information Dr. Martin Wieland
E-mail: martin.wieland48@
gmail.com
Martin Wieland is an expert in dam safety and earthquake engineering based in Switzerland. Since 1999, he has been the chairman of the International Commission on Large Dams’ Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam Design, a technical committee created in 1968 with representation from 34 member countries.
In 2022 he received an Honorary Member Award at ICOLD’s World Congress which was held in France. The award was established in 2000 and is given to experts who have made outstanding contributions to the development of dams in the world, or have made great achievements in the field of dam engineering.
ICOLD was founded in 1928 and is one of the oldest international professional organisations. There are 104 member countries and more than10,000 individual members.
www.waterpowermagazine.com | February 2023 | 13
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53
