search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Top: Steel reinforcement in place Centre: Relining works underway Bottom: Relining completed


In longer tunnels, where suction is not possible


(because of velocity loss through the length of the suction pipework), the suction pipework is ‘broken back’ to a distance where the suction velocity is still good. In this instance, waste is transported manually (for example by scrapers, barrows or trollies – although efforts are always made to mechanise the operation) from the location of the engineering teams back to the head of the suction pipes. Mussels were also a minor problem in the outlet


tunnel at the QEII Reservoir in South West London, where we were called in to carry out an £11m tunnel relining contract to strengthen the aging 1.06km-long inlet and 0.9km-long outlet tunnels to prevent leakage and to reinforce the integrity of the reservoir. The inlet and outlet tunnels run under the


embankments of three critical reservoirs, busy roads and property so the integrity of these tunnels is of the highest importance to Thames Water. Submersible ROV CCTV and Lidar surveys were used


to survey 72” internal pipework at the base of the reservoir that formed part of the outlet system. These digital surveys helped Thames Water to understand the hydraulic modelling of the reservoir pipework. Temporary shafts had to be constructed over the


existing tunnels for access. By creating 3D CAD models the temporary works team was able to break down the phases of work and specific requirements, helping to deliver a more efficient and safe solution. The models also provided visualisation of the works for the operations team and allowed a simpler interface between the temporary and permanent works to be designed such as the support required for breaking into the two tunnels. To protect our workforce relining the tunnels, we


worked collaboratively with Thames Water to complete and implement a robust and thorough isolation procedure. This included making sure that every valve and outfall into the tunnels was double isolated – with primary and secondary physical and electronic isolations. The molluscs and debris were cleared before both


of the tunnels were relined with poured concrete, with steel fixing done ahead of the concrete work. Shutters were installed insitu by the team, with concrete poured and cast in place. Operational challenges are not confined to the


condition of tunnels and their residents. Sometimes internal valves can form an obstacle in the tunnel. Gate valves are not so much of an issue as, when open, they leave nothing within the tunnel bore. Butterfly valves on the other hand, cannot be passed safely without having


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53