Above: Marina Bay Sands, Singapore
● Optimising space use: Relocating transit, utilities, and storage underground frees up surface land for green infrastructure, affordable housing, and public spaces. For instance, Helsinki’s ‘Underground Master Plan’ includes subterranean car parks, data centres, and even sports facilities, unlocking space above ground and making the surface more liveable and sustainable.
● Enhancing resilience: Underground spaces shield critical infrastructure from extreme weather and rising sea levels. They can also serve as emergency shelters during natural disasters. Japan’s ‘G-Cans Project’, a series of massive underground flood water reservoirs, for example, protects Tokyo from typhoon- induced flooding.
● Improving connectivity and liveability: By integrating transit hubs, pedestrian pathways, and utility systems, underground spaces reduce surface congestion and enhance accessibility. The RÉSO network in Montreal offers 33km of underground walkways, connecting metro stations, shopping centres, and offices while shielding pedestrians from harsh winters.
These examples demonstrate the transformative power of underground development—but achieving this vision requires addressing a host of technical and stakeholder- related challenges.
STAKEHOLDER DYNAMICS IN SUBTERRANEAN DEVELOPMENT Underground projects are inherently collaborative, requiring coordination among a wide range of stakeholders. Urban planners and architects focus on harmonising subterranean and surface-level systems, ensuring aesthetic and spatial integration. Engineers and developers address the technical complexities of structural integrity and geotechnical constraints while striving for cost efficiency. Policymakers and regulators are responsible for balancing economic growth with zoning laws, safety standards, and long-term urban resilience. Crucially, local communities play a central role, as their support—or resistance—can determine the fate of a project.
Take London’s Crossrail project, for instance. Its
success lay in early and sustained engagement with councils, residents, and heritage groups, which allowed the project to mitigate disruptions and address community concerns. Similarly, Tokyo’s flood mitigation infrastructure,
known as the ‘G-Cans Project’, involved extensive consultation with local stakeholders to ensure its dual functionality as a flood reservoir and a public amenity. These examples underscore the importance of fostering trust through transparent communication and participatory design processes. Cross-sector collaboration is equally pivotal. Public-
private partnerships (PPP) unlock both funding and technical expertise, ensuring that projects balance the interests of diverse parties. Singapore’s Marina Bay Sands is a case in point, integrating public utilities with private retail and leisure spaces in a way that maximises both economic and social returns. Such examples highlight the potential of collaborative frameworks to deliver projects that are not only functional but also economically viable and socially inclusive.
STRATEGIES FOR NAVIGATING STAKEHOLDER DYNAMICS Successfully managing stakeholder dynamics in underground urban development demands a thoughtful, multi-faceted approach. Early and sustained engagement with stakeholders
is a cornerstone of effective project delivery. Initiating conversations during the feasibility stage fosters alignment of objectives, mitigates potential conflicts, and builds trust. Innovative tools such as 3D modelling and participatory design workshops play a pivotal role in this process, offering stakeholders clear visualisations of project plans and their impacts. A prime example is London’s Crossrail project, which engaged a range of stakeholder groups from the outset. This proactive approach not only minimised disruptions but also ensured the preservation of cultural landmarks, demonstrating the value of inclusive planning. Collaboration across sectors amplifies the potential for success, bringing together the financial resources
February 2025 | 37
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53
