search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
NEW BUILD | REPURPOSING POWER SITES


Existing power sites and new nuclear


One opportunity to reduce the challenge of building new nuclear capacity is to develop reactors at existing large power generation sites. A new analysis explores existing coal-fired and nuclear power plant sites in the US to assess the new nuclear opportunity. The results show there is remarkable promise.


A NEW STUDY ON BEHALF of the US Department of Energy has concluded that there are well over one hundred coal- fired power plants in the USA that would be potentially suitable for siting up to 174 GWe of new nuclear capacity. The study, “Evaluation of Nuclear Power Plant and Coal


Power Plant Sites for New Nuclear Capacity” by the DOE’s Systems Analysis and Integration Campaign (SA&I), focused on estimating the number of potential new nuclear sites with a capacity of 600 MWe or more that could be situated on either currently operating or recently retired coal-fired power plants, as well as current nuclear power plant sites.


Developed using 2024 data on the operational status of


coal plants and on data from the 2022 coal-to-nuclear (C2N) study, the new analysis used the Oak Ridge Siting Analysis for power Generation Expansion tool, OR-SAGE.


Opportunities for new nuclear at coal-fired power plant sites To complement the 2022 C2N study a streamlined alternative OR-SAGE evaluation was performed that allowed coal-fired plant sites to be scored relative to their potential for a new nuclear power plant installation, an NPP backfit. Each CPP site was evaluated to include a 1-mile (1600 m) diameter around the generator and OR-SAGE was used to evaluate the site against 10 parameters. These parameters included population density, safe shutdown earthquake requirements, slope, landslide hazard and floodplain characteristics, as well as water flow for cooling, and proximity to hazards. If any of the OR-SAGE cells within assessment radius


exceeded one of these values then it is considered tripped. Of the 800 cells associated with the 1-mile radius area, the


Above: Existing coal-fired power plants have considerable scope for siting new nuclear capacity Source: GE Vernova


40 | February 2025 | www.neimagazine.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61