search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
GOLDEN HOUR For distinguished and outstanding service utilizing helicopters in air medical transport University of Maryland UAS Test Site


and University of Maryland, Baltimore College Park and Baltimore, Maryland, USA


On the night of Apr. 19, 2019, 44-year-old nursing assistant Trina Glispy waited at the University of Maryland Medical Center (UMMC), preparing for kidney transplant surgery. In her eighth year of dialysis for kidney failure, she had begun to lose hope. Destiny had another plan. When Glispy learned she had a match, she was offered a very special opportunity—the kidney could be delivered to


the hospital by drone, a medical first that would pave the way for faster organ delivery. Excited by the chance to make a difference, Glispy agreed to the delivery. As Glispy was prepped, an unmanned


aircraft system (UAS) team, led by University of Maryland UAS Test Site Director Matt Scassero and UMMC’s Dr. Joseph Scalea, awaited the arrival of the kidney from the Living Legacy Foundation, Maryland’s organ procurement organization. Once secured, the kidney was launched in a custom UAS, complete with real- time monitoring equipment. Te drone flew 2.8 miles in 9.52 minutes


at 300 ft. to the rooftop helipad at UMMC, faster than a car could have made the trip in Baltimore traffic. It landed smoothly with all organ-monitoring readings in the green. Te kidney was soon on its way to the operating room where Glispy waited. Te idea of organ transport by UAS was


Dr. Joseph Scalea (left) and Matt Scassero with their innovative drone.


born two and a half years earlier. Scalea approached Scassero after hearing about a fixed-wing drone test his team had conducted carrying medical equipment across the Chesapeake Bay and asked if the same could be done for an organ. “I was excited about the idea and challenge,” Scassero recalls. “Tis project was a lot more than a drone flight. We needed


to develop a drone with redundancies, to reduce risk, and identify how to track the state of the organ while it was in transit.” Scassero’s team embraced the challenge. Te drone was built from scratch with multiple redundancies, all the way down


to a parachute that could be deployed automatically or manually to protect the organ. Te team also designed the first-ever organ-monitoring system that tracks an organ’s condition in transport in real time, recording and uploading to the cloud temperature, pressure, and vibrations for live monitoring. Medical staff can later remove the onboard SD memory card to review the same data. “Nothing like this had ever been developed before,” Scassero says. “Currently, an organ is tested after harvest and then


tested again after arrival to ensure it’s still viable. With our monitoring system, we discovered the kidney we flew remained well within the parameters; I’d even say better than it would have in a car or helicopter. Te hope is one day this monitoring technology will replace the need for that second biopsy.” Glispy is doing very well and has returned to many of her former activities. Te technology that made her recovery


possible has also flourished. Members of the original team partnered with an investor to found MissionGO, a company that’s developing and expanding this technology and increasing organ donation efficiency through a new software product.


MARCH 2021 ROTOR 49


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92