search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Private hire and taxi


Insurance Specialists 01704 270 061


WAKEFIELD DRIVERS SCORE ‘LANDMARK’ WIN AGAINST COUNCIL’S LICENSING FEES


The High Court (HC) has quashed the licensing fees charged for hackney carriage and private hire vehi- cle licences set by Wakefield City Coun- cil (WCC), following a claim for judicial review by the Wake- field District Private Hire and Hackney Association. Millions of pounds could be paid out to taxi drivers after a ‘landmark’ court rul- ing found WCC has been overcharging for licensing fees for years. The HC found that the amount of money demanded from drivers was unlawful, and WCC now face a massive bill


held that the fees charged by WCC were unlawful.


In to reimburse


them all, backdated to 2004. The judicial review was brought after the council hiked up the cost of a licens- ing badge last year by 60 per cent to £384. His Honour Judge Saffman, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court in Leeds,


particular, the coun- cil had wrongly interpreted section 70 of the Local Gov- ernment (Miscellan- eous Provisions) Act 1976 and had erro- neously charged the costs of enforcement against drivers to the control and supervi- sion of vehicles. Wakefield Council’s case had been that the costs were prop- erly accounted for against vehicles be- cause the errant drivers were driving vehicles. The learned judge described that as ‘stretching be- yond breaking point’ the language of the section. In the course of the action it became apparent that WCC has


overcharged


PHV licence fees by an aggregate sum in excess of £1million, which will form the subject of a claim for restitution. The judge made it clear that where Par-


liament has awarded local authorities a broad discretion (e.g. “such fee as they think reasonable”) the courts have upheld policies of full cost recovery on the sole ground that the policies, being rea- sonable, are legal and within their pow- ers; but where, as in section 70 LGMPA 1976, the power to charge a fee is cir- cumscribed by ref- erence to specific functions,


those


functions are res- tricted to those specified items – ie. enforcement


on


vehicles, not drivers. The Judge also re- fused WCC per- mission to appeal, but the council can make an application to the Court of Appeal. If the council is unsuccessful in an appeal, it is suggest- ed that the com- pensation


figure


could be much more than £1 million. Liz Ogden, interim city solicitor at WCC, confirmed they were


seeking permission to appeal the court decision,


adding:


“The High Court has ordered that new taxi licence fees are set by March 5 2019. “We will continue to issue taxi licences, although until the new fees have been set, we


cannot


charge vehicle fees. Once the fees have been re-set,


the


appropriate fee for vehicle licences and inspections will be due and payable by vehicle owners.” At the time of this edition going to press, the transcript of the case was not available; we shall be examining it in more detail when it is pub- lished. However, from the information to hand at the present time it is apparent that this was not just a case of a council “charging too much” for their licensing fees; rather it was the misappro- priation of those fees that could well cost the council dearly.


TAXI FLEET SPECIALISTS www.milestonehouse.com


0113 259 3697


NO EXCUSE FOR ABUSE SEE PAGE 62


FLEET & BUSINESS


INSURANCE ADVISORS


lTaxi specialists lAll areas lAny drivers lExclusive facilities lFlexible payments lReplacement vehicle cover (non-fault)


0845 548 0163


SERVICES


Jan2019


Issue316


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80