ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS: A SELF- INFLICTED COMPETITIVE HANDICAP? Beyond economic pressures, European ammonia producers find themselves ensnared in an increasingly restrictive regulatory landscape. The European Emissions Trading System (ETS) and the Green Deal’s industrial decarbonisation mandates impose severe financial penalties on industries with high carbon footprints—among which ammonia production is a prime offender.
For every tonne of ammonia produced, roughly two tonnes of CO₂ are emitted, making it one of the most carbon-intensive industrial processes. The burden of carbon pricing further erodes Europe’s ability to compete on cost with global rivals who are either exempt from such stringent environmental regulations or operate in nations where industrial emissions remain politically unchallenged.
THE CARBON BORDER ADJUSTMENT MECHANISM: TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE? The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), the EU’s attempt to level the playing field by taxing imports from high-emission countries, remains embryonic. Whether it will offer genuine relief to European producers or merely act as a symbolic barrier remains uncertain. Meanwhile, ammonia imports from less regulated markets continue to rise, exacerbating carbon leakage rather than preventing it.
THE RISE OF GREEN AND BLUE AMMONIA: SALVATION OR MIRAGE? The industry’s hopes now rest on green ammonia— produced via electrolysis using renewable energy—and blue ammonia, a transitional solution that captures and stores CO₂ emissions from traditional processes.
Type of Ammonia
Grey Ammonia (Traditional)
Blue Ammonia (CCS-based)
Green Ammonia (Electrolysis- based)
Carbon Intensity
High
Production Cost
Low Moderate Medium Near zero High
Feasibility in Europe
Uncompetitive
Technically viable, but costly
Not yet commercially viable
The fundamental challenge is cost. At present, green ammonia is an order of magnitude more expensive than its fossil-based counterpart, while blue ammonia— hailed as a ‘transitional fix’—remains economically and logistically constrained by Europe’s underdeveloped Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) infrastructure.
THE SHORTCOMINGS OF BLUE AMMONIA Blue ammonia is frequently heralded as an interim solution, allowing for continued use of natural gas while mitigating emissions via CCS. However, fundamental flaws persist:
1. Carbon Capture Efficiency Limits – Most CCS systems only sequester 60–90% of emissions, leaving residual carbon penalties.
2. Infrastructure Gaps – Europe’s nascent CCS capacity is woefully insufficient for industrial- scale deployment.
3. Regulatory Ambiguity – The EU has yet to formally recognise blue ammonia as a long-term sustainable alternative, deterring investment.
In short, blue ammonia is a stopgap solution, not a panacea.
YARA’S TIGHTROPE WALK TO GREEN Yara International, Europe’s preeminent ammonia producer, epitomises the structural dilemma facing the industry. Confronted with escalating costs and regulatory headwinds, Yara has aggressively repositioned itself toward green ammonia, leveraging electrolysis-based production to sidestep natural gas dependency.
However, green ammonia remains prohibitively expensive and technologically unproven at scale. Yara’s investments in hydrogen-based ammonia production in Norway and the Netherlands underscore a broader reality: traditional ammonia production in Europe may no longer be viable.
28 | ADMISI - The Ghost In The Machine | Q1 Edition 2025
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44
