Your Answer to Comprehensive Security Solutions
What is the potential cost of a security incident to your business?
E Rapid Response Mobile Patrols
stimating the financial impact of a security incident to your
organisation is a difficult task.
Key Holding
That’s why the National Protective Security Authority (NPSA) has developed a bespoke tool to help security managers in the UK obtain a realistic estimate of the cost of losing a critical asset – The Asset Cost Estimation Tool (ACET).
CCTV Monitoring
Anti-Social Behaviour
Events & Festivals
This tool is free to use and should only take about 15 minutes to complete if you have already identified your critical assets.
Close Protection About the ACET
Concierge & Corporate
Innovations Security Guarding
Get a 100% FREE consultation
CONTACT US
Requiring only three key pieces of information – annual turnover, estimated number of full-time employees, and business sector – the ACET can help you to identify your critical assets as part of a security risk assessment process. It will then deliver an estimate of financial loss should any of these assets be affected by a security incident. These cost estimates can be used to evaluate options and develop business cases for the introduction of new security plans and measures, in a targeted and proportionate way. The ACET is completely confidential. It does not store any inputted data, nor is it logged or cached. If you choose to save your data this will be to your local storage, so you remain in control of your data.
How the ACET works
info@trojansecurityuk.co.uk 13 Advertisement
www.trojansecurityuk.co.uk 0330 113 9966
NPSA, the UK’s National Technical Authority for personnel and physical security, has developed the ACET drawing on credible open sources relating to past security incidents. The tool will ask you to identify the assets you wish to cost estimate and place them into the following categories: people, processes, technology, information, and facilities. Each one of
these categories is then further sub- divided to give more granularity to the final cost estimate.
To obtain the most accurate estimate you will be asked to identify your lowest and highest expected cost of losing that asset, and a confidence level for your figures. Where you are less than 100 per cent confident in your figures, the tool can lean on open-source data for similar incidents in your sector to provide more data on which to base an estimate. If you have no knowledge of the cost of losing your asset, but would still like to obtain an estimate, you can select an ‘industry standard’ option. The ACET will provide a cost estimate based on relevant open-source data within the tool.
You can pause your estimate at any time and save it locally to gather more information, and return to it at a later date. The tool has built in step-by-step guides to support you as you work through the estimation process and also links to NPSA’s website for advice on security risk assessment and identifying critical assets
The ACET instantly produces user- friendly, downloadable, graphs and charts, enabling users to visualise estimated losses, reasonable worst- case scenarios, and exposure per asset. Additionally, the ACET provides users with a comparison with other organisations in their selected sector where sufficient open-source data is available. Where there is insufficient data for your sector to make a reliable estimate, the tool will select the nearest comparison sector and will inform you where that data has been derived from.
How to access the ACET
To access the tool, visit the NPSA website at
www.npsa.gov.uk/acet. NPSA continues to research and develop this tool and your feedback would be very welcome.
© CITY SECURITY MAGAZINE – SUMMER 2025
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36