search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
he Protect Duty will establish requirements for security professionals to carry out risk assessments and proportionate mitigation measures for Publicly Accessible Locations. But how do we identify who is a suitably qualified security professional to carry out this role? And which public or professional organisation should carry it out?


T


Bill Nelson CSyP MSyI, who runs his own security consulting practice, lays out his views on the matter. The opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not represent the views of the individuals and organisations mentioned in the article.


Who would design a new building without employing a Fire Engineer or an HSE Consultant? Sadly, security has never enjoyed that same regulated status as Fire or HSE and is often overlooked or added as an afterthought – and then a few cameras are ‘thrown in’ and job done. The time is right to rectify this.


It is only now, in the wake of the Manchester Arena bombing and the subsequent Saunders Report, along with the tireless efforts of Figen Murray OBE, whose son Martyn Hett was killed that night, that the Protect Duty has been introduced, and hopefully it will go through Parliament later this year. Although not yet fully promulgated, it is understood that the intent of the new law is to require Owners and Operators of designated Publicly Accessible Locations (PALs) to conduct Counterterrorist Risk Assessments and implement ‘proportionate’ mitigation measures.


This article, however, is not about the Protect Duty per se. It is about how we establish the requirements for the individuals who will conduct these Counterterrorist Risk Assessments and design the ‘proportionate’ mitigation measures.


The Saunders Report was damming of the Risk Assessments carried out at the Manchester Arena – both generally and for the Ariana Grande concert itself – and of the lack of measures in place to counter the threat from a suicide bomber.


‘It was inadequate; it failed to adopt a rigorous approach to the assessment of the risk of terrorist attack and did not identify what steps should be taken to reduce the risk.’ ‘It was inadequate: it did not identify the threat from terrorism as a potential hazard and had descended into a box ticking exercise.’


Yet these assessments and plans were drawn up by so called security ‘professionals’. My question is – what constitutes a ‘Security Professional’?


4 © CITY SECURITY MAGAZINE – SUMMER 2022


Protect Duty:


To me, it seems ironic that even the most newly appointed security guard must, by law, be trained and licensed by the Security Industry Authority (SIA), yet the individuals who are responsible for the overall planning of security at large PALs or major events, under current law require no security qualification or experience whatsoever. Anyone can call themselves a Security Manager or a Security Consultant.


It is clear that this situation cannot continue. However, what is not clear is how change can be planned and implemented. That is probably why it has not been addressed before now – it has fallen into the ‘too difficult’ category. One of the issues is in defining what a Security Consultant is: there are many types of individuals who advise on many types of security – Security Design, Security Operations, Security Management, Close Protection, Maritime Security, Airport Security, HNW Individual Security etc. etc. – they can all be termed Security Consultants.


It is the same for Security Managers – there are many different types for many different functions and locations. So how can we possibly ensure that everyone has the right qualifications and experience? As at today, we cannot; therefore, we must establish priorities.


Those who consult with or manage PALs should be the first priority for being regulated – since these are the spaces which will be governed by the Protect Duty in the first instance and where the consequence of terrorist attack can be catastrophic. NaCTSO has stated that there are 93,000 PALs in the UK.


Clearly, not all will employ a Security Manager or require the services of a Security Consultant. Hopefully this will be defined and specified in the Duty when it is published.


Proposals for Requirements for Security Consultants


For PALS that will require security consultancy, my proposals for how the requirements could be categorised are as follows:


www.citysecuritymagazine.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36