search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
S


imon Riley, a governmental subject matter expert on threat replication, behavioural detection and situational awareness, shares his personal views on countering terrorism.


My approach to countering terrorism centres on tackling the basics first – removing the “low- hanging fruit”. This forces those acting with a terrorist mindset to work harder, take more risks and, ultimately, fail. For me, the most effective counter- terrorism measures sit in the deterrence space and always will.


These measures are proportionate to the real world and designed to deter the majority of terrorist activity, in all its forms – past, present and still to come. This approach has delivered significant successes and, importantly, it simplifies what should always be treated as a simple problem.


These ideas have evolved from my previous and current experience. I protect journalists that other states want to harm; I defend the physical and cyber environments of investment organisations targeted by Organised Crime Groups (OCGs) and their backers; I wrap personal safety procedures around politicians and government employees; I provide core protective security for public and private


buildings throughout the UK; and I operate across the political protest and direct action space. It is from this context that I can share the measures we should rely on when we counter terrorism.


First step: remove emotion


When contemplating a proactive and


protective response to terrorist threat, I believe emotion is our Achilles’ heel. Removing emotion from our response


should be the first measure we implement.


Without emotion, we can better identify the threat, the methodology and the potential outcomes. I will always double down on the impact of emotion because it so often leads to fear – and fear, in itself, is a win for terrorism and terrorists.


Four solid strands


Whether we are dealing with political protest, foreign influence, extremist individuals or organised groups, my recommended counter measures – the “game” – rest on four solid strands. These four strands are the low-hanging


The security solutions specialist


CIS-SECURITY.CO.UK 17 © CITY SECURITY MAGAZINE – SPRING 2026 Advertisement


020 8690 1903


CIS SECURITY


@CISSECURITYLTD


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36