The continued threat of
urban exploration to business
The Police response Methodology
The modus operandi for Urban Exploration has evolved, with various participants developing new methods for gaining entry into their targeted locations. General reconnaissance is conducted where the targeted location is visited prior to the attempt to identify potential points of entry and the positioning and quantity of security. Freeclimbing structures is the most common method, where the building’s exterior will be climbed without the use of safety equipment in order to access the roof area of the target.
More inventive methods have included prolific individuals dyeing their hair and adopting a disguise in order to bypass security into a site from which they had been banned. One individual even requested assistance from his followers to acquire theatrical prosthetics in order to further disguise his appearance. To this date, he has not delivered on his threat.
In July 2018, a prolific urban explorer showed their followers on the social media platform Snapchat a number of police uniform pieces that they had their possession, purportedly including an Airwave radio, a restricted device that requires each user to have a licence registered with the Cabinet Office, which he aimed to use in order to gain access to a location from which he had been barred.
Access to targeted buildings has also been obtained by urban explorers stating fake appointments with the building’s tenants. This particular tactic displays that significant research has been carried out prior to the attempt. Once inside the building, emergency doors have been opened to grant access to associates waiting outside.
Evolution of Urban Exploration
The activity has evolved into activities such as an overnight or 24-hour challenge where urban explorers or social nuisance individuals infiltrate a building or venue whilst it remains open for business. They then remain hidden until the building is closed. At that point, they emerge from hiding to explore the building or parts of it and conduct a variety of activities whilst trying to remain hidden from security personnel. The target locations for this activity include sporting stadiums.
An emerging modus operandi includes key urban explorers diversifying away from climbing and exploring buildings within the urban environment to engaging with other types of structure. There is a precedent for explorers to jump into the River Thames in London from atop a bridge or Docklands Light Railway (DLR) train. The use of drones to record high-quality aerial images has been present in previous years and comes with its own risks of flying in restricted airspace and the potential for the drone to lose control and damage property or injure a person(s).
The Threat Moving Forward
With the content being freely available to view online, Urban Exploration presents organised criminal gangs (OCGs) and terrorist organisations free hostile reconnaissance to analyse a building’s weakness, to effectively carry out a criminal or terrorist act. A large quantity of previously targeted buildings in London would be considered as prestige targets for terrorist organisations to carry out a large-scale attack. Despite multiple attempts by businesses to address these security challenges, the threat of urban exploration is likely to persist for the foreseeable future.
James Bradley | GSOC Alert Analyst, Mitie
C
ity of London Police has had an operation in place since 2015 to
combat urban exploring in the Square Mile. This recently became more of a focus following a number of high- profile incidents in the City, the ever-growing threat of terrorism and local businesses identifying it as one of their top concerns.
The main challenge in preventing urban exploring is that the act of trespass is primarily concerned in Civil Law and not Criminal Law. To combat this, the police have come up with a graduated response which targets repeat offenders and can end up in criminal proceedings.
The first step is to issue someone caught urban exploring with a Community Protection Warning (CPW) which sets out a number of rules the person must adhere to. If they don't adhere to these rules they can be issued with a Community Protection Notice (CPN). This is, in essence, a final warning. Breaching a CPN can result in a Criminal Behaviour Order (CBO) being issued before a criminal court. A further breach of a CBO could result in a fine or even a prison sentence.
A number of other police forces also have dedicated operations focusing on urban exploring, mostly based in the South East and they work closely with the City of London Police, meeting regularly and sharing information and intelligence.
Surrey Police were the first to explore the option of issuing CBOs, in a case against a well-known explorer. They have since used their expertise and knowledge in this process, to assist other forces in successfully issuing CBOs. The Metropolitan Police was the first force to see a CBO get through the court system and since then, Hertfordshire Police, following a high-profile incident of urban exploring at the Big Brother house.
> © CI TY S ECURI TY MAGAZ INE – S P R ING 2020 www. c i t y s e cu r i t yma g a z i n e . com
7
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36
