search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
22


CORE BANKING


Core banking in the cloud – cruising at 30,000ft in 2018


Time marches on, and CTOs count another year in which they’ve managed to get by with their ageing legacy systems. But with a slew of regulation headed their way and greater demands from a digital customer base, can they afford to stand in the way of change?


Senior Reporter Alex Hamilton


T


he times, they are a-changin’. The digitisation of the banking industry is in full swing, and as we explored in the January issue of IBS Journal, 2018 is the year that


regulation will change everything. Open Banking, PSD2, GDPR – all of these place a strain on a bank’s many disparate systems. But what of the core banking system, sat in the centre, eking out its existence, shuddering under the weight of bolt-on software, re-routes and APIs? Core Banking systems have survived via their intrinsic simplicity, yet some are older than most millennials.


Just over 20% of respondents to a recent survey conducted by Accenture and core banking vendor Temenos (see page 16) said that digitisation on their core systems were a priority. A further 32% said that legacy systems represent the biggest barrier to digitisation across all channels within their institutions. Are those figures still too low, though? Will 2018 be the year that that final straw is placed upon the camel’s back?


“There’s nothing magic about 2018 per se, but banks have avoided, deferred and delayed the issue of core modernisation for so long that it now places them at a competitive and operational disadvantage,” says Frank Sanchez, CEO and founder of cloud core banking firm Finxact. 2018 is a good time to change, though, in the sense that “the fintech market has developed advanced and viable alternatives to fully modernise and replace the legacy, while delivering increased efficiency, reduced operational risk and greater competitive agility”. In other words, adds Sanchez, the sooner a bank starts a migration, the sooner it can reap the benefits.


Christopher George, senior vice president for client strategies at Nymbus, says that “any bank CEO who insists on staying with a legacy core is putting his institution in a lose-lose situation.


Angelique Schouten, Ohpen: IT understanding and expertise needs to be added at board level of banks


The result, says George, will be “inferior software and an inferior infrastructure”. The Nymbus man doesn’t pull any punches: “Banks that go this route are destined to fall behind competitively. Soon that loss in software features and infrastructure efficiency will turn into a loss of customers and a loss of dollars.”


Angelique Schouten, founding CEO of Ohpen UK, says: “Core banking systems have survived due to the fact that they have been up and running for decades in an infrastructure that has increased


www.ibsintelligence.com | © IBS Intelligence 2018


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52