search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
UPDATE ON INTERNATIONAL PLANNING ISSUES CYPRUS


Aggressive taxation and invasion of privacy


[ PAOLO PANICO ]


IN SOME CASES, onshore jurisdictions can offer much of the tax benefit of offshore trusts. The privacy of


the trust is also a consideration. The New Zealand foreign trust takes advantage of what was originally an anti- avoidance provision: it exempts trusts with foreign settlors and under some treaties is treated as New Zealand resident, but an Act of 2017 requires registration of full information, initially and annually, and this information may be exchanged with other tax authorities. Ireland treats a settlement made by a non-resident settlor with professional trustees as non-resident for capital gains tax. The Czech trust is treated as a corporate body, taxable at 19%; it is about to be relieved of tax on dividends, but will require registration on a register partially available to public authorities. The fourth AML Directive


ECJ decisions indicating that full disclosure infringes the right to


There have been some


private life


requires the enactment of legislation providing for registration of corporate entities and trusts, but limiting access to trust information. It is currently proposed that access be limited to persons with a legitimate interest, but the European Parliament would


like to go further. There have been some ECJ decisions indicating that full disclosure infringes the right to private life, and similar views have been expressed by the French Constitutional Court, and Germany, the Czech Republic, Ireland, Liechtenstein and Singapore are variously reacting to this conflict between law enforcement and privacy. In the United States, the US ‘foreign trust’ offers tax advantages, and private trusts will not be governed by the CDD rules for US financial intermediaries.


The Common Reporting Standard – issues that have cropped up for trustees and private clients


[ NIKLAS SCHMIDT ]


COUNTRIES ARE REQUIRED by the CRS to cause


banks to collect and return information from reporting financial institutions, which is then exchanged with other jurisdictions. The rules can be seen as invading the individual’s right to respect for private life. In one case, a Portuguese resident was the founder and beneficiary of an Austrian private foundation. The foundation was a passive NFE, and the ‘controlling persons’ were the founder and board members. In the second case, an Austrian resident took out a life insurance policy with the Austrian branch of a Luxembourg insurance company and no reporting was required. In the third case, an Austrian individual was a


non-discretional beneficiary of a Jersey trust. The beneficiary and the protector were reportable. In the fourth case, an Austrian resident set up a Liechtenstein foundation, which was transparent for Austrian tax. The foundation had to treat the founder’s interest as a reportable account.


right to respect for private life


The rules can be seen as invading the individual’s


European Parliament would like to go further


THE ITPA GREEN BOOK 2018 www.itpa.org


It is proposed that access be limited to persons with a legitimate interest, but the


023


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116