BUSINESS NEWS COMMENT: CHRIS PHOTI, WHITE HART ASSOCIATES New Abta bond rules beneficial


After a backlash from the industry and the departure of some members, Abta has relaxed its rules on bonding and financial criteria. The updated Abta Membership


Rules and Financial Criteria has guidance on a new Bond+ scheme which provides members with intriguing options to cover non-Atol packages and offers alternatives to Abta’s unpopular bonding scheme based on peak-period projections. There is also guidance on a Retail Premium+ scheme which will replace the Travel Agents Bond Replacement Scheme (TABRS). Abta’s bonding rules continue to


be robust, some would say penal, as has been the case since the outbreak of the pandemic. However, the much-needed changes are more equitable and Bond+ will offer some respite for small and medium-sized companies which have struggled to find cover in the insurance market. In addition, Abta has at last


corrected some bizarre rules around retail bonds, deciding they will no longer be needed for some retail activities. At 29 pages, the new rules simplify


the February 2015 guidance on financial criteria which ran to 82 pages – albeit the new rules must be considered in conjunction with the lengthy Abta Articles of Association, Abta Code of Conduct and Abta Pipeline Protection Scheme Claims Rules & Procedures. There is also an unhelpful rider


that there could be discrepancies between these. Abta outlines which trump the other in that event. The new financial criteria


have three simple terms of reference to assess the financial strength of members: 1) Share


travelweekly.co.uk


capital, 2) Adjusted net assets and 3) Adjusted net current assets. All must show a surplus. Abta has done away with its archaic system of insisting members have a net current asset balance equal to at least 4% of principal turnover, although this remains a factor in the calculation of Bond+ options. The adjustments to net assets and net current assets are broadly as before. There will be a three-year transition to


July 1, 2026, in applying these criteria. BOND+


Bond+ will be introduced from July 1, 2023, giving members a choice of bonding options to cover their non-Atol packages. Members may continue to bond as


currently with a maximum peak-period bonding assessment based upon customer money collected in advance, partially mitigated for payments collected by UK credit cards, alongside the mandatory shortfall insurance premium payable to Abta’s ‘captive’ [in-house] insurer, Abta


Abta’s bonding rules continue to be robust,


some would say penal. However, the much-needed changes are more equitable and Bond+ will offer some respite for small and medium-sized firms which have struggled to find cover in the insurance market


Insurance PCC Ltd (AIPCC). However, members will be provided with an alternative, risk-assessed lower bond (never less than 10% of projected turnover) alongside the mandatory insurance premium, plus an additional shortfall insurance premium called Principal Premium+. These terms will be presented to individual members case by case. Principal Premium+ will be


calculated by the AIPCC Board – on which some of the Abta secretariat sit – with reference to the new financial criteria, an adjusted net current asset balance equal to at least 4% of principal turnover, and the member’s bonding application form and customer-monies profile. The calculations for Principal


Premium+ will not be based on a set formula or made public as Abta believes this would disclose “commercially sensitive information”. Abta’s Pipeline Protection Scheme


bond levels remain unchanged, but there have been some interesting changes to the retail bond scheme.


TABRS AND RETAIL PREMIUM+ Abta has replaced TABRS with a similar insurance scheme called Retail Premium+. Eligible members – those who meet the new financial criteria and whose


Applicable Risk Turnover is under £500,000 – can pay a premium to Abta Insurance PCC, at defined rates, instead of providing a retail bond. In addition, Abta has corrected some anomalies in its protection scheme by no longer requiring members to provide retail bonds for the following retail activities: corporate sales under a general agreement; sales of overseas accommodation-only; and where all agent sales are of non-Abta ‘principals’. For many years Abta has required


members to provide bonds to protect pipeline monies when they act as agents for non-Abta principals. There was no discernible reason for this other than to collect larger bonds because non-Abta principals cannot make claims against the Abta bonding scheme. Abta also, for many years, applied


a bizarre approach to retail members selling accommodation-only overseas as agents – levying a bond on such sales at 10% of the gross retail turnover, while permitting principal members not to bond identical accommodation-only sales. It’s welcome this has ceased. These changes amount to a step in


the right direction by Abta, although it is disappointing the calculations for the


Principal Premium+ remain secret. i Chris Photi is head of travel and leisure at White Hart Associates, specialist accountants for the travel industry


8 JUNE 2023


47


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52