NSBRC Masterclass: planning permission
or many self-builders, securing planning permission can feel like the fi nish line. In reality, it is something uite different a milestone signifi cant, yes but only one step in a longer and often more complex journey.
hat follows a planning decision is frequently what determines whether a project progresses smoothly or becomes delayed by detail, timing and process. And it is here, rather than at the point of approval itself, that many projects begin to falter. While certain minor elements of development may fall within permitted development rights, these are typically limited in scale. Crucially, all projects – regardless of size – will still require building control approval before work can begin.
W
Over the past decade, the planning system in England and Wales has undergone substantial change. Updates to national policy have reinforced a presumption in favour of sustainable development, streamlining guidance at a high level. Yet planning remains inherently local. Adopted local plans, appeal decisions, national policy and site-specifi c constraints all interact sometimes in confl icting ways. As a result, interpretation and timing often matter as much as design itself. On paper, approval rate trends may appear encouraging. In practice, however, self-build projects – particularly those involving new dwellings or sensitive sites – are rarely straightforward.
OUTLINE PERMISSION OR PERMISSION IN PRINCIPLE?
For many applicants, outline planning permission represents the fi rst meaningful step. It establishes whether development is acceptable in principle, without requiring detailed design at the outset. This can be a strategic way to test a site before committing to signifi cant
20
Once planning permission is granted, there is no time to pause
architectural costs. However, outline consent is not
permission to build. It is better understood as an agreement to move forward into a more detailed stage of assessment – one that is often underestimated. An alternative route is Permission in Principle (PIP), introduced as a lower-cost, simplifi ed option. hile attractive at fi rst glance, it comes with important limitations. Only a narrow set of matters are considered at this stage, meaning key issues – such as ecology, heritage impact, access or tree
constraints – may not be fully assessed. The risk is clear: a site may appear to have consent, but still prove undeliverable once these factors are examined in detail. Early professional advice is essential before relying on PIP when acquiring land.
WHAT HAPPENS AFTER OUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSION?
Securing outline permission is not the end of the process – it is the beginning of a more detailed and time-sensitive phase. Before development can lawfully
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68
