search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BUILDING ENVELOPE


What makes a great roof?


Before embarking on any self-build or renovation project it’s important to understand the difference between offsite manufacturing (OSM) and traditional build roofing. Here Chris Powell from Pasquil explains the differences, and highlights the benefits of OSM


W


hat makes a great roof is a question posed time and again by self-builders. The answer?


It’s all in the truss. This wooden structure supports the structure above a home and is a popular choice due to its cost-effectiveness and design flexibility. Roof trusses, or trussed rafters as they are otherwise known, have by and large replaced traditional cut-and-fit roofs, and can save you time, effort, and money when it comes to specifying a roof for your dream home.


CONSTRUCTION METHODS Offsite manufactured roof trusses are the most widely used form of roof framing in the UK, as they provide a cost-effective and flexible solution. Trusses are not only the new norm for simple roof structures but are also increasingly seen as the ideal method for turning a complex architectural vision into a working roof. With a truss roof the structural element is constructed offsite to specific calculations. They arrive ready-made and are quickly erected, with diagonal and longitudinal bracing to avoid wind deflections. There are also plenty of different truss roof styles on the market including designs for flat roofs or vaulted ceilings. Engineered timber roof trusses hugely


reduce the amount of time spent installing the structural elements of a roof compared to traditional build methods. OSM also allows just-in-time delivery and therefore negates the need for large storage space onsite. The more traditional cut-roof method,


where the timbers of the roof are made up onsite using complex engineering and traditional joinery skills, is much more expensive, labour intensive and time consuming.


nov/dec 2021


OFFSITE MANUFACTURING VS. TRADITIONAL BUILD


OSM techniques have certainly gained momentum over the last few years; not only are these methods more sustainable due to waste reduction, but they have been found to minimise inefficiencies and eradicate delays on site. Providing standardised components,


offsite delivers a variety of other benefits. A repeatable manufacturing process that delivers the same component, at the same output rate to an agreed quality standard has clear advantages in terms of predictability and efficiency. Reducing the margin for error can result in a faster turnaround onsite, with less need for rework.


Speed of construction is another key area with OSM solutions drastically


reducing the amount of time it takes to build a property when compared to traditional techniques. Unaffected by weather or other trades, offsite manufactured roofs are quick to construct and can be also tailored to suit any budget. However, if you’re keen to create something more bespoke – and you’re willing to spend the extra money – then a traditional build may be more suitable. Bear in mind, though, that this option can be incredibly labour intensive, and costs must be factored in for extended scaffolding hire and waste removal. OSM methods can also give you peace of mind that your build is manufactured to the highest standards. With traditional build, builders or joiners may not have a Quality Assurance Scheme in place to


www.sbhonline.co.uk 57


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84